Implementing PROMs in routine clinical care: a qualitative exploration of GP perspectives
- PMID: 33199306
- PMCID: PMC7960526
- DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101135
Implementing PROMs in routine clinical care: a qualitative exploration of GP perspectives
Abstract
Background: The recently announced long-term plan for the NHS is based on a model of person-centred care, which relies on the sustained engagement of patients, shared decision making, and capability for self-management. For a primary care service under increasing pressure from an ageing and chronically ill population, Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) appear capable of supporting many of the requirements for person-centred care, yet little is known of the circumstances of their current implementation or how their use might be optimised.
Aim: To begin the conversation about how successfully PROMs have been integrated into primary care and how their use might be supported.
Design & setting: A qualitative investigation of the perspectives of GPs exploring the use of PROMs as part of routine clinical care in England.
Method: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with GPs from across England. The data were analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Results: A total of 25 interviews were conducted and GPs described the potential benefit of PROMs in a range of circumstances, but also voiced concerns about their reliability and their potential to constrain consultations. Their flexibility meant they had the potential to be incorporated into existing care processes but only with the requisite logistical support.
Conclusion: Areas that need to be addressed include the creation of a compelling body of evidence of the benefit of PROMs, appropriate training for staff and patients, and a coherent implementation strategy from policymakers and funding bodies.
Keywords: family practice; general practitioners; patient perspectives; qualitative research.
Copyright © 2020, The Authors.
Similar articles
-
General practitioners' views on use of patient reported outcome measures in primary care: a cross-sectional survey and qualitative study.BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jan 24;21(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1077-6. BMC Fam Pract. 2020. PMID: 31980021 Free PMC article.
-
Chiropractors' views on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a qualitative study.Chiropr Man Therap. 2018 Dec 18;26:50. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0219-6. eCollection 2018. Chiropr Man Therap. 2018. PMID: 30568787 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric solid organ transplantation: Exploring stakeholder perspectives on clinical implementation through qualitative description.Qual Life Res. 2021 May;30(5):1355-1364. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02743-8. Epub 2021 Jan 14. Qual Life Res. 2021. PMID: 33447959 Free PMC article.
-
Digital First Primary Care for those with multiple long-term conditions: a rapid review of the views of stakeholders.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(21):1-68. doi: 10.3310/AWBT4827. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 39056123 Review.
-
What are the attitudes of health professionals regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in oncology practice? A mixed-method synthesis of the qualitative evidence.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4939-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32041593 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Implementing strategies to improve uptake of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in gender-affirming care: a mixed-methods implementation study.BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 22;13(2):e002777. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002777. BMJ Open Qual. 2024. PMID: 38649199 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies.Qual Life Res. 2022 Jun;31(6):1597-1620. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03003-z. Epub 2021 Sep 27. Qual Life Res. 2022. PMID: 34580822
-
Perspectives of Patients and Professionals on Implementing a Computer Adaptive Vision-Related Quality of Life Outcome (CAT-EyeQ) in Clinical Practice.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Mar 1;13(3):6. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.3.6. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024. PMID: 38470320 Free PMC article.
-
'It is important to feel invited': what patients require when using the Utrecht Symptom Diary - 4 Dimensional, a qualitative exploration.Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Jun 20;18:26323524241260426. doi: 10.1177/26323524241260426. eCollection 2024. Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024. PMID: 38911602 Free PMC article.
-
Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test: A systematic review of measurement properties and COSMIN analysis.Clin Transl Allergy. 2022 Sep;12(9):e12194. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12194. Clin Transl Allergy. 2022. PMID: 36178185 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- NHS England The NHS long term plan. https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/nhs-long-term.... [7 Oct 2020];2019
-
- Royal College of General Practitioners Personalised care. https://www.rcgp.org.uk/clinical-and-research/our-programmes/about-perso.... [16 Dec 2020];2019
-
- NHS England Personalised care. https://www.england.nhs.uk/personalisedcare/ [7 Oct 2020];2019
-
- NHS England Comprehensive model of personalised care. https://www.england.nhs.uk/personalisedcare/comprehensive-model-of-perso... [7 Oct 2020];2019
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources