Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions
- PMID: 33199859
- DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-01009-0
Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions
Abstract
Assessing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 is critical to inform future preparedness response plans. Here we quantify the impact of 6,068 hierarchically coded NPIs implemented in 79 territories on the effective reproduction number, Rt, of COVID-19. We propose a modelling approach that combines four computational techniques merging statistical, inference and artificial intelligence tools. We validate our findings with two external datasets recording 42,151 additional NPIs from 226 countries. Our results indicate that a suitable combination of NPIs is necessary to curb the spread of the virus. Less disruptive and costly NPIs can be as effective as more intrusive, drastic, ones (for example, a national lockdown). Using country-specific 'what-if' scenarios, we assess how the effectiveness of NPIs depends on the local context such as timing of their adoption, opening the way for forecasting the effectiveness of future interventions.
Comment in
-
Which are the best pandemic policies? Data trackers are trying to judge.Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7849):189. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00590-2. Nature. 2021. PMID: 33674805 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The temporal association of introducing and lifting non-pharmaceutical interventions with the time-varying reproduction number (R) of SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study across 131 countries.Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30785-4. Epub 2020 Oct 22. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33729915 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the impacts of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in Canada based on mobile network.PLoS One. 2021 Dec 29;16(12):e0261424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261424. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34965272 Free PMC article.
-
The Effects of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19 Mortality: A Generalized Synthetic Control Approach Across 169 Countries.Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 4;10:820642. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.820642. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35444988 Free PMC article.
-
Nonpharmaceutical interventions in Turkey and worldwide during COVID-19 pandemic.Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Dec 17;51(SI-1):3207-3214. doi: 10.3906/sag-2106-210. Turk J Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 34590802 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical public health interventions against COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2021 Nov 23;16(11):e0260371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260371. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34813628 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
In-person school reopening and the spread of SARS-CoV-2 during the second wave in Spain.Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 13;10:990277. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.990277. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36311601 Free PMC article.
-
ASPHER Statement: Facing the Fourth Winter of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Public Health Rev. 2022 Oct 3;43:1605395. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2022.1605395. eCollection 2022. Public Health Rev. 2022. PMID: 36267593 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and earthquake on mental health of persons with severe mental illness: A survey study among people receiving community mental health care versus treatment as usual in Croatia.Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023 May;69(3):653-663. doi: 10.1177/00207640221130966. Epub 2022 Nov 1. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 36317586 Free PMC article.
-
Associations between changes in population mobility in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and socioeconomic factors at the city level in China and country level worldwide: a retrospective, observational study.Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Jun;3(6):e349-e359. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00059-5. Lancet Digit Health. 2021. PMID: 34045001 Free PMC article.
-
Two years of COVID-19 pandemic: Framework of health interventions in a Brazilian city.Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;10:1025410. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1025410. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36388316 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Qualls, N. L. et al. Community mitigation guidelines to prevent pandemic influenza – United States, 2017. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 66, 1–34 (2017).
-
- Tian, H. et al. An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science 368, 638–642 (2020). - DOI
-
- Chen, S. et al. COVID-19 control in China during mass population movements at New Year. Lancet 395, 764–766 (2020). - DOI
-
- Lee, K., Worsnop, C. Z., Grépin, K. A. & Kamradt-Scott, A. Global coordination on cross-border travel and trade measures crucial to COVID-19 response. Lancet 395, 1593–1595 (2020). - DOI
-
- Chakraborty, I. & Maity, P. Covid-19 outbreak: migration, effects on society, global environment and prevention. Sci. Total Environ. 728, 138882 (2020).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- MA16-045/Vienna Science and Technology Fund (Wiener Wissenschafts-, Forschungs- und Technologiefonds)/International
- 20-001/Vienna Science and Technology Fund (Wiener Wissenschafts-, Forschungs- und Technologiefonds)/International
- COV 20-017/Vienna Science and Technology Fund (Wiener Wissenschafts-, Forschungs- und Technologiefonds)/International
- 857136/Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (Austrian Research Promotion Agency)/International
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous