A Framework-Driven Systematic Review of the Barriers and Facilitators to Teledermatology Implementation
- PMID: 33200042
- PMCID: PMC7658914
- DOI: 10.1007/s13671-020-00323-0
A Framework-Driven Systematic Review of the Barriers and Facilitators to Teledermatology Implementation
Abstract
Purpose of review: Telemedicine use in dermatology, termed "teledermatology", offers a cost-effective model to improve healthcare efficiency and access. Only a minority of dermatology practices has integrated teledermatology into their practice prior to COVID-19. A thorough understanding of the barriers and facilitators may promote teledermatology adoption. Implementation science frameworks offer theoretically driven ways to assess factors affecting teledermatology implementation. This review uses a comprehensive implementation science framework to summarize barriers and facilitators of teledermatology implementation and appraises the quality of existing research.
Recent findings: Technological characteristics of teledermatology (e.g., user-friendliness) and factors within the outer setting (e.g., reimbursement and legal considerations) were the most commonly reported barriers. No existing studies use a comprehensive implementation framework to identify factors influencing teledermatology implementation. Many included studies have a risk of bias in at least two of the five study quality indices evaluated.
Summary: This systematic review is the first study to summarize the existing teledermatology implementation literature into well-defined constructs from a comprehensive implementation science framework. Findings suggest future studies would benefit from the use of an implementation framework to reduce study bias, improve result comprehensiveness, facilitate comparisons across studies, and produce evidence-based resolutions to implementation barriers. Tools, resources, and recommendations to facilitate the use of an implementation framework in future studies are provided.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13671-020-00323-0.
Keywords: COVID-19; Dermatology; Teledermatology; Telemedicine.
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of InterestAll authors (Edwin Dovigi, Elaine Kwok, Joseph English III) declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Bramanti A, Bonanno L, Celona A, Bertuccio S, Calisto A, Lanzafame P, et al. GIS and spatial analysis for costs and services optimization in neurological telemedicine. 2010 Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBC’10. 2010;2204–7. - PubMed
-
- Brown EM. The Ontario telemedicine network: a case report. Telemed e-Health. 2013;19(5):373–376. - PubMed
-
- Zakaria A, Maurer T, Su G, Amerson E. Impact of teledermatology on the accessibility and efficiency of dermatology care in an urban safety-net hospital: a pre-post analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(6):1446–1452. - PubMed
-
- Rothstein BE, Gonzalez J, Cunningham K, Saraiya A, Dornelles AC, Nguyen BM. Direct and indirect patient costs of dermatology clinic visits and their impact on access to care and provider preference. Cutis. 2017;100(6):405–410. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials