Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 24;11(10):761-808.
doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i10.761.

Colorectal liver metastases: Current management and future perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Colorectal liver metastases: Current management and future perspectives

Jack Martin et al. World J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

The liver is the commonest site of metastatic disease for patients with colorectal cancer, with at least 25% developing colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) during the course of their illness. The management of CRLM has evolved into a complex field requiring input from experienced members of a multi-disciplinary team involving radiology (cross sectional, nuclear medicine and interventional), Oncology, Liver surgery, Colorectal surgery, and Histopathology. Patient management is based on assessment of sophisticated clinical, radiological and biomarker information. Despite incomplete evidence in this very heterogeneous patient group, maximising resection of CRLM using all available techniques remains a key objective and provides the best chance of long-term survival and cure. To this end, liver resection is maximised by the use of downsizing chemotherapy, optimisation of liver remnant by portal vein embolization, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, and combining resection with ablation, in the context of improvements in the functional assessment of the future remnant liver. Liver resection may safely be carried out laparoscopically or open, and synchronously with, or before, colorectal surgery in selected patients. For unresectable patients, treatment options including systemic chemotherapy, targeted biological agents, intra-arterial infusion or bead delivered chemotherapy, tumour ablation, stereotactic radiotherapy, and selective internal radiotherapy contribute to improve survival and may convert initially unresectable patients to operability. Currently evolving areas include biomarker characterisation of tumours, the development of novel systemic agents targeting specific oncogenic pathways, and the potential re-emergence of radical surgical options such as liver transplantation.

Keywords: Cancer; Colorectal; Liver; Management; Metastases; Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Biomarkers, molecular pathways, existing and emerging therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer. A: Biomarkers and molecular pathways in colorectal cancer. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) pathway: EGFR is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase[340]. EGF binding to the extracellular domain results in activation of down- stream intracellular signalling pathways such as RAS-RAF-MEK-MAPK, and the PI3K PKB mTOR pathway, amongst others, which favour cell proliferation and survival[341-344]; Angiogenesis pathway: Vascular endothelial growth factors influence angiogenesis in health and disease via binding to the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. Deregulated angiogenesis impacts on progression in solid tumours, thus providing potential anti-angiogenic therapies[345]; Wnt pathway: The Wnt genes are vast family of highly conserved genes with wide ranging roles in development, cell proliferation and migration and tumorigenesis[346]. Beta catenin accumulation in the cytoplasm and nucleus leads to cell proliferation. Excess beta catenin accumulation is prevented by its destruction by the “beta catenin destruction complex” (a multiprotein assembly containing adenomatous polyposis coli and GSK3). Wnt binding to its receptor frizzled leads to impaired function of the Beta catenin destruction complex and hence beta catenin accumulation and cell proliferation[347]. Mutations in adenomatous polyposis coli prevent the formation of the beta catenin complex, and therefore allow beta catenin accumulation and cell proliferation. PI3K inhibits the function of GSK3[112], thereby impairing the beta catenin destruction complex, hence contributing to the tumorigenic accumulation of beta catenin. B: Existing and emerging therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer pathways. B: Cetuximab and Panitumumab are monoclonal antibodies targeting the EGFR, thus blocking activation of downstream signalling pathways. Mutated and constitutively active downstream effectors (such as RAS and RAF) confer resistance to EGFR blockade. Erlotinib and gefitinib are EGFR Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and are associated with improved PFS when combined to Bevacizumab in the DREAM trial[156]. Vemurafenib is a RAF inhibitor which in combination with EGFR blockade[157] has shown marked responses in some case reports[158]. Selumetinib is a MEK kinase inhibitor showing tumour response in some patients with KRAS mutant colorectal cancers progressing on Oxaliplatin[159]. Regorafenib inhibits is a multi-kinase inhibitor[153], with OS benefit in randomised double blind control trials[154,155]. Bevacizumab is a Monoclonal antibody against VEGFA with the most prominently established role in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Famitinib is a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor and targets the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the VEGF receptors are also under investigation[160]. EGF: Epidermal Growth Factor; EGFR: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor; EGFR TKI: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor; K-ras: K-Ras protein (product of the proto-oncogene KRAS); BRAF: BRAF protein (product of the proto-oncogene BRAF; MEK: Mitogen activated protein kinase which activates MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase); VEGF: Vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR: Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PKB: Protein kinase B; mTOR: Mammalian target of Rapamycin; Wnt: Wnt protein product of proto-oncogne Wnt; Frizzled Receptor: Receptor for Wnt; APC: Protein product of the tumour suppressor gene APC (Adenomatous polyposis coli); GSK3: Glycogen synthase kinase 3.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A hypothetical example is shown. A: Patient A (with a single superficial colorectal liver metastases); B: Patient B (with 10 superficial colorectal liver metastases).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Management options in synchronous colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases, according to presentation criteria. CRC: Colorectal cancer; CRLM: Colorectal liver metastases.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Multiple colorectal metastases in a formalin-fixed liver resection specimen showing a pale cut surface with typical lobulated border. Non-capsular surfaces inked for margin identification (scale bar: 5 cm).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Colorectal metastasis with typical cribriform glandular architecture and central comedonecrosis (Hematoxylin-eosin staining, × 10 magnification).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Embolic material within a large portal vein branch, with adjacent adenocarcinoma, in a patient who underwent preoperative portal vein embolization (Hematoxylin-eosin staining, × 4 magnification).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Extensive confluent tumour necrosis with fibrosis in keeping with a partial response to neoadjuvant therapy (Hematoxylin-eosin staining, × 4 magnification).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Confluent fibrosis and dystrophic calcification without viable residual tumour cells, consistent with pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy (Hematoxylin-eosin staining, × 4 magnification).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dekker E, Tanis PJ, Vleugels JLA, Kasi PM, Wallace MB. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2019;394:1467–1480. - PubMed
    1. Schreuders EH, Ruco A, Rabeneck L, Schoen RE, Sung JJ, Young GP, Kuipers EJ. Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes. Gut. 2015;64:1637–1649. - PubMed
    1. Neal RD, Din NU, Hamilton W, Ukoumunne OC, Carter B, Stapley S, Rubin G. Comparison of cancer diagnostic intervals before and after implementation of NICE guidelines: analysis of data from the UK General Practice Research Database. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:584–592. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skipworth RJ, Parks RW, Stephens NA, Graham C, Brewster DH, Garden OJ, Paterson-Brown S. The relationship between hospital volume and post-operative mortality rates for upper gastrointestinal cancer resections: Scotland 1982-2003. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36:141–147. - PubMed
    1. Cecil TD, Sexton R, Moran BJ, Heald RJ. Total mesorectal excision results in low local recurrence rates in lymph node-positive rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1145–9; discussion 1149-50. - PubMed