Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021;28(1):58-66.
doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0166. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

Low dose of ROSuvastatin in combination with EZEtimibe effectively and permanently reduce low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration independently of timing of administration (ROSEZE): A randomized, crossover study - preliminary results

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Low dose of ROSuvastatin in combination with EZEtimibe effectively and permanently reduce low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration independently of timing of administration (ROSEZE): A randomized, crossover study - preliminary results

Karolina Obońska et al. Cardiol J. 2021.

Abstract

Background: In an attempt to improve low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level control in patients ineffectively treated with statins, we evaluated the effectiveness of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of 10 mg rosuvastatin and ezetimibe and its relation to the timing of drug administration.

Methods: A randomized, open label, single center, crossover study involving 83 patients with coronary artery disease and hypercholesterolemia with baseline LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL. In arm I the FDC drug was administered in the morning for 6 weeks, then in the evening for the following 6 weeks and vice versa in arm II. The primary endpoint was the change in LDL-C after 6 and 12 weeks.

Results: The median LDL-C concentration at baseline, after 6 and 12 weeks respectively was: 98.10 mg/dL (Q1;Q3: 85.10;116.80), 63.14 mg/dL (50.70;77.10) and 59.40 mg/dL (49.00;73.30); p < 0.001. LDL-C levels were similar regardless of the timing of drug administration (morning 62.50 mg/dL [50.70;76.00] vs. evening 59.70 mg/dL [48.20;73.80]; p = 0.259], in both time points: 6 week: 63.15 mg/dL (50.75;80.65) vs. 63.40 mg/dL (50.60;74.00), p = 0.775; and 12 week: 62.00 mg/dL (50.20;74.40) vs. 59.05 mg/dL (47.65;66.05), p = 0.362. The absolute change in LDL-C concentration for the morning vs. evening drug administration was - 6 week: -34.6 mg/dL (-56.55; -19.85) (-34.87%) vs. -31.10 mg/dL (-44.20; -16.00) (-35.87%) (p not significant); 12. week: -34.20 mg/dL (-47.8; -19.0) (-37.12%) vs. -37.20 mg/dL (-65.55; -23.85) (-40.06%) (p not significant). The therapy was safe and well tolerated.

Conclusions: Fixed-dose combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe significantly and permanently decreases LDL-C regardless of the timing of drug administration.

Keywords: adherence; apolipoprotein B; fixed-dose; hypercholesterolemia; lipoprotein(a); secondary prevention; timing of administration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Primary endpoint: Change in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after 6 and 12 weeks of therapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration depending on time of day of study drug administration.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Morning administration of the study drug: change in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration depending of time of testing.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Evening administration of the study drug: change in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration depending of time of testing.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Change in total cholesterol (TC) concentration after 6 and 12 weeks of therapy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur Heart J. 2018;39:119–177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Townsend N, Nichols M, Scarborough P, et al. Cardiovascular disease in Europe–epidemiological update 2015. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(40):2696–2705. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv428. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Catapano A, Graham I, De Backer G, et al. 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias. The Task Force for the Management of Dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Assocciation for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR) Eur Heart J. 2016;37(39):2999–3058. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw272.. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(1):111–188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reiner Ž, De Backer G, Fras Z, et al. Lipid lowering drug therapy in patients with coronary heart disease from 24 European countries — Findings from the EUROASPIRE IV survey. Atherosclerosis. 2016;246:243–250. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.01.018. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms