Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020;27(6):888-890.
doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0163. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

Left main coronary artery ostial disease: Prognostic role of the gap-angle ratio

Affiliations

Left main coronary artery ostial disease: Prognostic role of the gap-angle ratio

Gianluca Rigatelli et al. Cardiol J. 2020.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared

Similar articles

References

    1. Dishmon DA, Elhaddi A, Packard K, et al. High incidence of inaccurate stent placement in the treatment of coronary aortoostial disease. J Invasive Cardiol. 2011;23(8):322–326. - PubMed
    1. Patel Y, Depta JP, Patel JS, et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound on the long-term clinical outcomes in the treatment of coronary ostial lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87(2):232–240. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gutiérrez-Chico JL, Villanueva-Benito I, Villanueva-Montoto L, et al. Szabo technique versus conventional angiographic placement in bifurcations 010-001 of Medina and in aorto-ostial stenting: angiographic and procedural results. EuroIntervention. 2010;5(7):801–808. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i7a134. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ohashi K, Abe D, Kuroki N, et al. Clinical impact of the gap-angle ratio in patients with ostial lesions of the right coronary artery undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart Vessels. 2019;34(11):1717–1727. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01417-x. - DOI - PubMed