Early Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Coronavirus Disease 2019: Association With Hospital Mortality and Factors Associated With Removal of Tracheostomy Tube at ICU Discharge. A Cohort Study on 121 Patients
- PMID: 33201005
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004752
Early Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Coronavirus Disease 2019: Association With Hospital Mortality and Factors Associated With Removal of Tracheostomy Tube at ICU Discharge. A Cohort Study on 121 Patients
Abstract
Objectives: Early tracheotomy, defined as a procedure performed within 10 days from intubation, is associated with more ventilator free days, shorter ICU stay, and lower mortality than late tracheotomy. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, it was especially important to save operating room resources and to have a shorter ICU stay for patients, when ICUs had insufficient beds. In this context of limited resources, early percutaneous tracheostomy could be an effective way to manage mechanically ventilated patients. Nevertheless, current recommendations suggest delaying or avoiding the tracheotomy in coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Aim of the study was to analyze the hospital mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 patients who had received early percutaneous tracheostomy and factors associated with removal of tracheostomy cannula at ICU discharge.
Design: Cohort study.
Setting: Coronavirus disease 2019 ICU.
Patients: Adult patients with coronavirus disease 2019 3 days after ICU admission.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Three days after ICU admission, 164 patients were present in ICU and included in the analysis. One-hundred and twenty-one patients (74%) were tracheostomized, whereas the other 43 (26%) were managed with translaryngeal intubation only. In multivariable analysis, early percutaneous tracheostomy was associated with lower hospital mortality. Sixty-six of tracheostomized patients (55%) were discharged alive from the hospital. Age and male sex were the only characteristics that were independently associated with mortality in the tracheostomized patients (45.5% and 62.8% in tracheostomized and nontracheostomized patients, respectively; p = 0.009). Tracheostomy tube was removed in 47 of the tracheostomized patients (71%). The only variable independently associated with weaning from tracheostomy at ICU discharge was a faster start of spontaneous breathing after tracheotomy was performed.
Conclusions: Early percutaneous tracheostomy was safe and effective in coronavirus disease 2019 patients, giving a good chance of survival and of weaning from tracheostomy cannula at ICU discharge.
Copyright © 2020 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Early Percutaneous Tracheostomy During the Pandemic "As Good as It Gets".Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;49(2):361-364. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004759. Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 33214388 No abstract available.
-
Early Percutaneous Tracheostomy in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Era: Shining New Light on Old Questions.Crit Care Med. 2021 May 1;49(5):e556-e557. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004884. Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 33653975 No abstract available.
-
The authors reply.Crit Care Med. 2021 May 1;49(5):e557-e558. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004960. Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 33653977 No abstract available.
-
Unclear Benefit of Early Tracheostomy In Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul 1;49(7):e721-e722. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005003. Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 33779584 No abstract available.
-
Outcomes and Safety of Early Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients Admitted to the ICU.Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun 1;49(6):e653-e654. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004925. Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 33861554 No abstract available.
-
The authors reply.Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul 1;49(7):e722-e723. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005079. Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 33870922 No abstract available.
-
The authors reply.Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun 1;49(6):e654-e655. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004984. Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 34011838 No abstract available.
References
-
- Abe T, Madotto F, Pham T, et al.; LUNG-SAFE Investigators and the ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICUs across 50 countries. Crit Care. 2018; 22:195
-
- Hosokawa K, Nishimura M, Egi M, et al. Timing of tracheotomy in ICU patients: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2015; 19:424
-
- Higgins KM, Punthakee X. Meta-analysis comparison of open versus percutaneous tracheostomy. Laryngoscope. 2007; 117:447–454
-
- Sommer DD, Engels PT, Weitzel EK, et al. Recommendations from the CSO-HNS taskforce on performance of tracheotomy during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020; 49:23
-
- McGrath BA, Ashby N, Birchall M, et al. Multidisciplinary guidance for safe tracheostomy care during the COVID-19 pandemic: The NHS National Patient Safety Improvement Programme (NatPatSIP). Anaesthesia. 2020; 75:1659–1670
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
