Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Safety: Automatic Assessment of the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Deep Learning
- PMID: 33201104
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004351
Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Safety: Automatic Assessment of the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Deep Learning
Abstract
Objective: To develop a deep learning model to automatically segment hepatocystic anatomy and assess the criteria defining the critical view of safety (CVS) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
Background: Poor implementation and subjective interpretation of CVS contributes to the stable rates of bile duct injuries in LC. As CVS is assessed visually, this task can be automated by using computer vision, an area of artificial intelligence aimed at interpreting images.
Methods: Still images from LC videos were annotated with CVS criteria and hepatocystic anatomy segmentation. A deep neural network comprising a segmentation model to highlight hepatocystic anatomy and a classification model to predict CVS criteria achievement was trained and tested using 5-fold cross validation. Intersection over union, average precision, and balanced accuracy were computed to evaluate the model performance versus the annotated ground truth.
Results: A total of 2854 images from 201 LC videos were annotated and 402 images were further segmented. Mean intersection over union for segmentation was 66.6%. The model assessed the achievement of CVS criteria with a mean average precision and balanced accuracy of 71.9% and 71.4%, respectively.
Conclusions: Deep learning algorithms can be trained to reliably segment hepatocystic anatomy and assess CVS criteria in still laparoscopic images. Surgical-technical partnerships should be encouraged to develop and evaluate deep learning models to improve surgical safety.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Development of an artificial intelligence system for real-time intraoperative assessment of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8755-8763. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10328-y. Epub 2023 Aug 11. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37567981
-
Towards reliable hepatocytic anatomy segmentation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using U-Net with Auto-Encoder.Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7358-7369. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10306-4. Epub 2023 Jul 25. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37491657
-
Formalizing video documentation of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety.Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2709-2714. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07149-3. Epub 2019 Oct 3. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31583466
-
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos).J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):73-86. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.517. Epub 2018 Jan 10. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018. PMID: 29095575 Review.
-
Detection of anatomic landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the use of artificial intelligence-a systematic review of the literature.Updates Surg. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02227-9. Online ahead of print. Updates Surg. 2025. PMID: 40350500 Review.
Cited by
-
An artificial intelligence-based nerve recognition model is useful as surgical support technology and as an educational tool in laparoscopic and robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery.Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5394-5404. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10939-z. Epub 2024 Jul 29. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 39073558 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical quality assessment of critical view of safety in 283 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos by surgical residents and surgeons.Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3609-3614. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10873-0. Epub 2024 May 20. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38769182 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence applied to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: what is the next step? A narrative review.Updates Surg. 2024 Sep;76(5):1655-1667. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01892-6. Epub 2024 Jun 5. Updates Surg. 2024. PMID: 38839723 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial intelligence-enhanced navigation for nerve recognition and surgical education in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1388-1396. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11489-0. Epub 2025 Jan 6. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 39762611 Free PMC article.
-
A Comprehensive Video Dataset for Surgical Laparoscopic Action Analysis.Sci Data. 2025 May 24;12(1):862. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05093-7. Sci Data. 2025. PMID: 40413211 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tornqvist B, Stromberg C, Persson G, et al. Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study. BMJ 2012; 345:e6457.
-
- Alkhaffaf B, Decadt B. 15 years of litigation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Ann Surg 2010; 251:682–685.
-
- Berci G, Hunter J, Morgenstern L, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: first, do no harm; second, take care of bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 2013; 27:1051–1054.
-
- Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 180:101–125.
-
- Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, et al. Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 2003; 237:460–469.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials