Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;12(5):922-930.
doi: 10.1177/2192568220972080. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

The Effect of Traditional Single Growing Rod Technique on the Growth of Unsegmented Levels in Mixed-Type Congenital Scoliosis

Affiliations

The Effect of Traditional Single Growing Rod Technique on the Growth of Unsegmented Levels in Mixed-Type Congenital Scoliosis

Tianhua Rong et al. Global Spine J. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective case series.

Objectives: To present outcomes concerning patients with early-onset mixed-type congenital scoliosis (EOMTCS) treated with the traditional single growing rod (TSGR), focusing on the growth of unsegmented levels (USLs).

Methods: Patients with EOMTCS who underwent TSGR and had a minimum of 4 USLs, 4 distractions, and 3-year follow-up were enrolled. Spine radiographs before and after index surgery and at the latest follow-up were evaluated. The length of the concave and convex side of USLs and thoracic parameters were measured. The absolute value and percentage of growth were calculated.

Results: Fourteen patients (mean age, 7.3 ± 2.8 years) were enrolled. The average follow-up duration was 4.9 ± 1.2 years, during which time 84 distractions and 8 final fusions were performed. The average number of USLs was 6.3 ± 2.2. The total and annual percent growth of concave side of USLs was significantly higher than convex side (32.2 ± 13.3% vs. 23.9 ± 9.5%, p = 0.007; 6.8 ± 2.7%/year vs. 5.1% ± 2.2%/year, p = 0.007, respectively). The concave-to-convex ratio of USLs increased from 58.6 ± 6.4 ± 7.6% at baseline to 68.8 ± 9.3% at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). The Campbell's space available for lung ratio increased from 74.9 ± 11.1% at baseline to 89.6 ± 7.0% at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In patients with EOMTCS, unilateral repetitive lengthening with TSGR can accelerate the growth of the concave side of USLs and improve the symmetry of the thorax.

Keywords: failure of segmentation; mixed-type congenital scoliosis; single growing rod; spinal growth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schema of radiograph measurements. a) Freehand measurement of the concave and convex side of unsegmented levels; b and b’) coronal and sagittal T1-T12 height; c and c’) coronal and sagittal T1-S1 height; d) maximal thoracic width; e) Campbell’s space available for lung ratio; f) maximal thoracic depth.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A & B) All-spine radiographs before index surgery; C) 3-D CT showed extensive vertebral malformation and segmentation failure; D & E) T2-weighted coronal and axial MRI identified type 2 split cord malformation at the thoracolumbar area. F & G) After index surgery. H & I) After seventh distraction with in-situ fusion.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A & B) Coronal films before and after index surgery. Patient No. 8 experienced a 50% decrease of MEP when T2 screw insertion (yellow arrow), which was resolved by adjusting the direction of the screw. C & D) Coronal films before and after index surgery. Patient No. 9 had complex deformity with syringomyelia and tethered cord. He suffered a 60% decrease of MEP during correction maneuver, which was resolved by a slight compromise of correction rate (reducing the amount of distraction).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hensinger RN. Congenital scoliosis: etiology and associations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(17):1745–1750. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181abf69e - PubMed
    1. Williams BA, Matsumoto H, McCalla DJ, et al. Development and initial validation of the Classification of Early-Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(16):1359–1367. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.00253 - PubMed
    1. Pahys JM, Guille JT. What’s new in congenital scoliosis? J Pediatr Orthop. 2018;38(3):e172–e179. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000000922 - PubMed
    1. Lonstein JE. Long-term outcome of early fusions for congenital scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2018;6(5):552–559. doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2018.02.003 - PubMed
    1. Yang S, Andras LM, Redding GJ, Skaggs DL. Early-onset scoliosis: a review of history, current treatment, and future directions. Pediatrics. 2016;137(1):e20150709. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-0709 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources