Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Nov 17;20(1):1736.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09661-x.

The RESPECT study: a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a sexual health promotion intervention for people with serious mental illness in community mental health services in the UK

Elizabeth Hughes  1   2 , Natasha Mitchell  3 , Samantha Gascoyne  3 , Thirimon Moe-Byrne  3 , Amanda Edmondson  4 , Elizabeth Coleman  3 , Lottie Millett  5 , Shehzad Ali  3 , Francine Cournos  6 , Ceri Dare  7 , Catherine Hewitt  3 , Sonia Johnson  5   8 , Harminder Dosanjh Kaur  7 , Karen McKinnon  6 , Catherine Mercer  9 , Fiona Nolan  10 , Charlotte Walker  7 , Milton Wainberg  6 , Judith Watson  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The RESPECT study: a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a sexual health promotion intervention for people with serious mental illness in community mental health services in the UK

Elizabeth Hughes et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: People with serious mental illness (SMI) have sexual health needs but there is little evidence to inform effective interventions to address them. In fact, there are few studies that have addressed this topic for people with SMI outside USA and Brazil. Therefore, the aim of the study was to establish the acceptability and feasibility of a trial of a sexual health promotion intervention for people with SMI in the UK.

Method: The RESPECT study was a two-armed randomised controlled, open feasibility trial (RCT) comparing Sexual health promotion intervention (3 individual sessions of 1 h) (I) or treatment as usual (TAU) for adults aged 18 or over, with SMI, within community mental health services in four UK cities. The main outcome of interest was the percentage who consented to participate, and retained in each arm of the trial, retention for the intervention, and completeness of data collection. A nested qualitative study obtained the views of participants regarding the acceptability of the study using individual telephone interviews conducted by lived experience researchers.

Results: Of a target sample of 100, a total of 72 people were enrolled in the trial over 12 months. Recruitment in the initial months was low and so an extension was granted. However this extension meant that the later recruited participants would only be followed up to the 3 month point. There was good retention in the intervention and the study as a whole; 77.8% of those allocated to intervention (n = 28) received it. At three months, 81.9% (30 I; 29 TAU) and at 6 months, 76.3% (13 I and 16 TAU) completed the follow-up data collection. No adverse events were reported. There was good completeness of the data. The sexual health outcomes for the intervention group changed in favour of the intervention. Based on analysis of the qualitative interviews, the methods of recruitment, the quality of the participant information, the data collection, and the intervention were deemed to be acceptable to the participants (n = 22).

Conclusions: The target of 100 participants was not achieved within the study's timescale. However, effective strategies were identified that improved recruitment in the final few months. Retention rates and completeness of data in both groups indicate that it is acceptable and feasible to undertake a study promoting sexual health for people with SMI. A fully powered RCT is required to establish effectiveness of the intervention in adoption of safer sex.

Study registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN15747739 prospectively registered 5th July 2016.

Keywords: Feasibility; Mental health; Psychosis; Randomised controlled trial; Sexual behavior; Sexual health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Hughes has received honoraria from Lundbeck pharmaceuticals for delivery of educational talks to mental health staff on the topic of sexual health promotion in mental health.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort Diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Recruitment
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bonfils KA, Firmin RL, Salyers MP, Wright ER. Sexuality and intimacy among people living with serious mental illnesses: factors contributing to sexual activity. Psychiatric Rehabil J. 2015;38(3):249–255. doi: 10.1037/prj0000117. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meade CS, Sikkema KJ. HIV risk behavior among adults with severe mental illness: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005;25(4):433–457. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.02.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hughes E, Bassi S, Gilbody S, Bland M, Martin F. Prevalence of HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C in people with severe mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(1):40–48. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00357-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dutra MRT, Campos LN, Guimarães MDC. Sexually transmitted diseases among psychiatric patients in Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis. 2014;18(1):13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2013.04.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simoila L, Isometsä E, Gissler M, Suvisaari J, Sailas E, Halmesmäki E, Lindberg N. Schizophrenia and induced abortions: A national register-based follow-up study among Finnish women born between 1965–1980 with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Schizophr Res. 2018;192:142–147. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.05.039. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types