Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 17;10(1):20015.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76786-9.

The use of prostate specific antigen density to predict clinically significant prostate cancer

Affiliations

The use of prostate specific antigen density to predict clinically significant prostate cancer

Igor Yusim et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive value of prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in men undergoing systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. We retrospectively analyzed data of men who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy because of elevated PSA (≤ 20 ng/ml) or abnormal digital rectal examination. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to compare PSA and PSAD performance and chi-square automatic interaction detector methodologies were used to identify predictors of clinically significant cancer (Gleason score ≥ 7 or international society of urological pathology grade group ≥ 2). Nine-hundred and ninety-two consecutive men with a median age of 66 years (IQR 61-71) were included in the study. Median PSAD was 0.10 ng/ml2 (IQR 0.10-0.22). Prostate adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 338 men (34%). Clinically significant prostate adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 167 patients (50% of all cancers and 17% of the whole cohort). The AUC to predict clinically significant prostate cancer was 0.64 for PSA and 0.78 for PSAD (P < 0.001). The highest Youden's index for PSAD was at 0.20 ng/ml2 with 70% sensitivity and 79% specificity for the diagnosis of clinically significant cancer. Men with PSAD < 0.09 ng/ml2 had only 4% chance of having clinically significant disease. The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSAD between 0.09 and 0.19 ng/ml2 was significantly higher when prostate volume was less than 33 ml. In conclusion, PSAD was a better predictor than PSA alone of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients undergoing TRUS-guided biopsy. Patients with PSAD below 0.09 ng/ml2 were unlikely to harbor clinically significant prostate cancer. Combining PSAD in the gray zone (0.09-0.19) with prostate volume below 33 ml adds diagnostic value of clinically significant prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC for the comparison between PSA and PSAD for the diagnosis of the prostate cancer. ROC curves comparing PSA and PSAD predictive accuracy to detect overall (A) and clinically significant (B) prostate cancer. P for comparison between the PSA and PSAD is < 0.001 in A and B. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; PSAD, PSA density.

References

    1. Boyle P, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004. Ann. Oncol. 2005;16:481–488. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi098. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Naji L, Randhawa H, Sohani Z, Dennis B, Lautenbach D, Kavanagh O, et al. Digital rectal examination for prostate cancer screening in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Fam. Med. 2018;16:149–154. doi: 10.1370/afm.2205. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loeb S, Bjurlin MA, Nicholson J, Tammela TL, Penson DF, Carter HB, et al. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2014;65:1046–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.062. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benson MC, Seong Whang I, Pantuck A, Ring K, Kaplan SA, Olsson CA, et al. Prostate specific antigen density: a means of distinguishing benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer. J. Urol. 1992;147:815–816. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37393-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polascik TJ, Oesterling JE, Partin AW. Prostate specific antigen: a decade of discovery—what we have learned and where we are going. J. Urol. 1999;162:293–306. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68543-6. - DOI - PubMed

Substances