Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 26;5(10):604-613.
doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200004. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Prevention of infection in primary THA and TKA

Affiliations
Review

Prevention of infection in primary THA and TKA

Philip F Dobson et al. EFORT Open Rev. .

Abstract

Rates of peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in primary total hip and total knee arthroplasty range between 0.3% and 1.9%, and up to 10% in revision cases. Significant morbidity is associated with this devastating complication, the economic burden on our healthcare system is considerable, and the personal cost to the affected patient is immeasurable.The risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and PJI is related to surgical factors and patient factors such as age, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities, and lifestyle. Reducing the risk of SSI in primary hip and knee arthroplasty requires a multi-faceted strategy including pre-operative patient bacterial decolonization, screening and avoidance of anaemia, peri-operative patient warming, skin antisepsis, povidone-iodine wound lavage, and anti-bacterial coated sutures.This article also considers newer concepts such as the influence of bearing surfaces on infection risk, as well as current controversies such as the potential effects of blood transfusion, laminar flow, and protective hoods and suits, on infection risk. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:604-613. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200004.

Keywords: arthroplasty; hip; infection; knee; surgical site infection (SSI).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ICMJE Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest relevant to this work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lister J. On the antiseptic principle in the practice of surgery. Br Med J. 1867;2:246–248. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Namba RS, Inacio MC, Paxton EW. Risk factors associated with surgical site infection in 30,491 primary total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:1330–1338. - PubMed
    1. Brown NM, Cipriano CA, Moric M, Sporer SM, Della Valle CJ. Dilute betadine lavage before closure for the prevention of acute postoperative deep periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:27–30. - PubMed
    1. Negus JJ, Gifford PB, Haddad FS. Single-stage revision arthroplasty for infection: an underutilized treatment strategy. J Arthroplasty 2017;32:2051–2055. - PubMed
    1. Diener MK, Knebel P, Kieser M, et al. Effectiveness of triclosan-coated PDS Plus versus uncoated PDS II sutures for prevention of surgical site infection after abdominal wall closure: the randomised controlled PROUD trial. Lancet 2014;384:142–152. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources