Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 26;5(10):724-741.
doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190070. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Advanced techniques in amputation surgery and prosthetic technology in the lower extremity

Affiliations
Review

Advanced techniques in amputation surgery and prosthetic technology in the lower extremity

Gerhard M Hobusch et al. EFORT Open Rev. .

Abstract

Bone-anchored implants give patients with unmanageable stump problems hope for drastic improvements in function and quality of life and are therefore increasingly considered a viable solution for lower-limb amputees and their orthopaedic surgeons, despite high infection rates.Regarding diversity and increasing numbers of implants worldwide, efforts are to be supported to arrange an international bone-anchored implant register to transparently overview pros and cons.Due to few, but high-quality, articles about the beneficial effects of targeted muscle innervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI), these surgical techniques ought to be directly transferred into clinical protocols, observations and routines.Bionics of the lower extremity is an emerging cutting-edge technology. The main goal lies in the reduction of recognition and classification errors in changes of ambulant modes. Agonist-antagonist myoneuronal interfaces may be a most promising start in controlling of actively powered ankle joints.As advanced amputation surgical techniques are becoming part of clinical routine, the development of financing strategies besides medical strategies ought to be boosted, leading to cutting-edge technology at an affordable price.Microprocessor-controlled components are broadly available, and amputees do see benefits. Devices from different manufacturers differ in gait kinematics with huge inter-individual varieties between amputees that cannot be explained by age. Active microprocessor-controlled knees/ankles (A-MPK/As) might succeed in uneven ground-walking. Patients ought to be supported to receive appropriate prosthetic components to reach their everyday goals in a desirable way.Increased funding of research in the field of prosthetic technology could enhance more high-quality research in order to generate a high level of evidence and to identify individuals who can profit most from microprocessor-controlled prosthetic components. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:724-741. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190070.

Keywords: RPNI; TMR; amputation surgery; bone-anchored prosthesis; prosthetic technology bionics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ICMJE Conflict of interest statement: RB reports board membership of, consultancy to and stock options in Integrum AB, outside the submitted work. RW reports consultancy to Stryker GmbH, grants/grants pending from Stryker Wirbelkörperversorgung, Johnson & Johnson Medical Products/DePuy Synthes Austria and CeramTec, and royalties from Johnson & Johnson Medical Products/DePuy Synthes Austria, outside the submitted work. The other authors declare no conflict of interest relevant to this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Numbers of publications split by journal impact factor in presented five categories.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of publications split by journal ranking (JCR) in presented five categories.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Flow diagram showing the selection process of this review’s articles.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Illustration of the principle of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR). (A) Muscle before amputation with motor nerve and by-passing mixed nerve. (B) Muscle and by-passing nerve are cut during amputation. (C) Muscle is denervated. (D) Mixed nerve re-innervates the muscle. (based on BodyParts3D, [http://lifesciencedb.jp/bp3d/] © The DatabaseCenter for Life Science licensed under CC Attribution-ShareAlike 2.1 Japan)
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Illustration of the principle of regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI). (A) Muscle before amputation with motor nerve and by-passing mixed nerve. (B) Muscle and by-passing nerve are cut during amputation. (C) Two free muscle grafts are harvested from a nearby muscle. (D) Two RPNIs are designed by wrapping the nerve ends with the free muscle flaps. (based on BodyParts3D, [http://lifesciencedb.jp/bp3d/] © The DatabaseCenter for Life Science licensed under CC Attribution-ShareAlike 2.1 Japan)
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Numbers of publications split by countries of origin in category ‘prosthetic technology’.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Potter BK. Editorial comment: symposium: recent advances in amputation surgery and rehabilitation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:2938–2941. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pierce RO, Jr, Kernek CB, Ambrose TA., II The plight of the traumatic amputee. Orthopedics 1993;16:793–797. - PubMed
    1. Meulenbelt HE, Geertzen JH, Jonkman MF, Dijkstra PU. Determinants of skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:74–81. - PubMed
    1. Ehde DM, Czerniecki JM, Smith DG, et al. Chronic phantom sensations, phantom pain, residual limb pain, and other regional pain after lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:1039–1044. - PubMed
    1. Harris AM, Althausen PL, Kellam J, Bosse MJ, Castillo R; Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP) Study Group. Complications following limb-threatening lower extremity trauma. J Orthop Trauma 2009;23:1–6. - PubMed