Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 9;1(7):100109.
doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100109.

Artificial Intelligence Meets Citizen Science to Supercharge Ecological Monitoring

Affiliations
Review

Artificial Intelligence Meets Citizen Science to Supercharge Ecological Monitoring

Eva C McClure et al. Patterns (N Y). .

Abstract

The development and uptake of citizen science and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques for ecological monitoring is increasing rapidly. Citizen science and AI allow scientists to create and process larger volumes of data than possible with conventional methods. However, managers of large ecological monitoring projects have little guidance on whether citizen science, AI, or both, best suit their resource capacity and objectives. To highlight the benefits of integrating the two techniques and guide future implementation by managers, we explore the opportunities, challenges, and complementarities of using citizen science and AI for ecological monitoring. We identify project attributes to consider when implementing these techniques and suggest that financial resources, engagement, participant training, technical expertise, and subject charisma and identification are important project considerations. Ultimately, we highlight that integration can supercharge outcomes for ecological monitoring, enhancing cost-efficiency, accuracy, and multi-sector engagement.

Keywords: AI; CS; automation; big data; biological conservation; data processing; deep learning; machine learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example Uses of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in Ecological Monitoring
Figure 2
Figure 2
Typical Roles of Citizen Science and Artificial Intelligence in Data Collection, Processing, and Analysis Note, there is a growing movement to involve citizen scientists at all stages of the scientific workflow, including data analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The Opportunities (Top) and Challenges (Bottom) of Citizen Science (Left) and Artificial Intelligence (Right) for Ecological Monitoring, Including Integration Opportunities (Top Center Overlap) and Challenges Common to Both Categories are efficiency (opportunities only), accuracy, discovery, engagement, resources, and ethics (challenges only) across each row of text. Superscripts refer to the following supporting references: 1,, 2, 3,, 4,,, 5,, 6,,, 7, 8,,, 9,, 10, 11,,, 12, 13, 14,, 15, 16,, 17, 18, 19,, 20, 21,,,, and 22.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Important Project Considerations when Implementing Citizen Science or Artificial Intelligence for Ecological Monitoring Project attributes placed toward either citizen science (CS) or artificial intelligence (AI) indicate relatively higher importance for that technique, but not a lack of importance for the other technique. Project attributes placed in the middle indicate equally high importance for both CS and AI. All project attributes would be important to consider for integrated approaches. Placement of attributes is guided by the literature and may change over time.

References

    1. Cord A.F., Brauman K.A., Chaplin-Kramer R., Huth A., Ziv G., Seppelt R. Priorities to advance monitoring of ecosystem services using earth observation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2017;32:416–428. - PubMed
    1. Hays G.C., Bailey H., Bograd S.J., Bowen W.D., Campagna C., Carmichael R.H., Casale P., Chiaradia A., Costa D.P., Cuevas E. Translating marine animal tracking data into conservation policy and management. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2019;34:459–473. - PubMed
    1. Allan B.M., Nimmo D.G., Ierodiaconou D., VanDerWal J., Koh L.P., Ritchie E.G. Futurecasting ecological research: the rise of technoecology. Ecosphere. 2018;9:e02163.
    1. Hill A.P., Prince P., Piña Covarrubias E., Doncaster C.P., Snaddon J.L., Rogers A. AudioMoth: evaluation of a smart open acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2018;9:1199–1211.
    1. Christin S., Hervet E., Lecomte N. Applications for deep learning in ecology. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2019;10:1632–1644.

LinkOut - more resources