Consensus statement on the content of clinical reasoning curricula in undergraduate medical education
- PMID: 33205693
- DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1842343
Consensus statement on the content of clinical reasoning curricula in undergraduate medical education
Abstract
Introduction: Effective clinical reasoning is required for safe patient care. Students and postgraduate trainees largely learn the knowledge, skills and behaviours required for effective clinical reasoning implicitly, through experience and apprenticeship. There is a growing consensus that medical schools should teach clinical reasoning in a way that is explicitly integrated into courses throughout each year, adopting a systematic approach consistent with current evidence. However, the clinical reasoning literature is 'fragmented' and can be difficult for medical educators to access. The purpose of this paper is to provide practical recommendations that will be of use to all medical schools.
Methods: Members of the UK Clinical Reasoning in Medical Education group (CReME) met to discuss what clinical reasoning-specific teaching should be delivered by medical schools (what to teach). A literature review was conducted to identify what teaching strategies are successful in improving clinical reasoning ability among medical students (how to teach). A consensus statement was then produced based on the agreed ideas and the literature review, discussed by members of the consensus statement group, then edited and agreed by the authors.
Results: The group identified 30 consensus ideas that were grouped into five domains: (1) clinical reasoning concepts, (2) history and physical examination, (3) choosing and interpreting diagnostic tests, (4) problem identification and management, and (5) shared decision making. The literature review demonstrated a lack of effectiveness for teaching the general thinking processes involved in clinical reasoning, whereas specific teaching strategies aimed at building knowledge and understanding led to improvements. These strategies are synthesised and described.
Conclusion: What is taught, how it is taught, and when it is taught can facilitate clinical reasoning development more effectively through purposeful curriculum design and medical schools should consider implementing a formal clinical reasoning curriculum that is horizontally and vertically integrated throughout the programme.
Keywords: Consensus; clinical reasoning; curriculum; medical education; undergraduate.
Similar articles
-
Teaching Clinical Reasoning in the Preclinical Period.Mil Med. 2024 Aug 30;189(9-10):2177-2183. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad370. Mil Med. 2024. PMID: 37738179
-
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447004
-
Teaching Students How to Think: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Preclerkship Clinical Reasoning Instruction.Mil Med. 2023 May 18;188(Suppl 2):50-55. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad036. Mil Med. 2023. PMID: 37201489
-
Best Practices in North American Pre-Clinical Medical Education in Sexual History Taking: Consensus From the Summits in Medical Education in Sexual Health.J Sex Med. 2018 Oct;15(10):1414-1425. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.08.008. J Sex Med. 2018. PMID: 30297093 Review.
-
Clinical Reasoning Curricula in Preclinical Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review.Acad Med. 2023 Aug 1;98(8):958-965. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005197. Epub 2023 Mar 1. Acad Med. 2023. PMID: 36862627
Cited by
-
Tumor board simulation improves interdisciplinary decision-making in medical students.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 30;150(8):407. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05908-x. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39212783 Free PMC article.
-
Why is it so difficult to implement a longitudinal clinical reasoning curriculum? A multicenter interview study on the barriers perceived by European health professions educators.BMC Med Educ. 2021 Nov 12;21(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02960-w. BMC Med Educ. 2021. PMID: 34772405 Free PMC article.
-
Deliberate practice of diagnostic clinical reasoning reveals low performance and improvement of diagnostic justification in pre-clerkship students.BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 21;23(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04541-5. BMC Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 37735677 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical reasoning education in the clerkship years: A cross-disciplinary national needs assessment.PLoS One. 2022 Aug 18;17(8):e0273250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273250. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35980994 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing clinical reasoning in the OSCE: pilot-testing a novel oral debrief exercise.BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 3;23(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04668-5. BMC Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 37789308 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous