Comparing Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection With Conservative Treatment in Improving Quality of Life of Patients With Diverticulitis: The Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection Following Diverticulitis (LASER) Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 33206182
- PMCID: PMC7675217
- DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5151
Comparing Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection With Conservative Treatment in Improving Quality of Life of Patients With Diverticulitis: The Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection Following Diverticulitis (LASER) Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: Diverticulitis has a tendency to recur and affect quality of life.
Objective: To assess whether sigmoid resection is superior to conservative treatment in improving quality of life of patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis.
Design, setting, and participants: This open-label randomized clinical trial assessed for eligibility 128 patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis in 6 Finnish hospitals from September 29, 2014, to October 10, 2018. Exclusion criteria included age younger than 18 years or older than 75 years; lack of (virtual) colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy data within 2 years, or presence of cancer, contraindication to laparoscopy, or fistula. Outcomes were assessed using intention-to-treat analysis. A prespecified interim analysis was undertaken when 66 patients had been randomized and their 6-month follow-up was assessable. Data were analyzed from June 2018 to May 2020.
Interventions: Laparoscopic sigmoid resection or conservative treatment.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was difference in Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) score between randomization and 6 months.
Results: Of 128 patients assessed for eligibility, 90 were randomized (28 male [31%]; mean [SD] age, 54.11 [11.9] years; 62 female [69%]; mean [SD] age, 57.13 [7.6] years). A total of 72 patients were included in analyses for the primary outcome (37 in the surgery group and 35 in the conservative treatment group), and 85 were included in analyses for clinical outcomes (41 in the surgery group and 44 in the conservative treatment group). The difference between GIQLI score at randomization and 6 months was a mean of 11.96 points higher in the surgery group than in the conservative treatment group (mean [SD] of 11.76 [15.89] points vs -0.2 [19.07] points; difference, 11.96; 95% CI, 3.72-20.19; P = .005). Four patients (10%) in the surgery group and no patients in the conservative treatment group experienced major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher). There were 2 patients (5%) in the surgery group and 12 patients (31%) in the conservative treatment group who had new episodes of diverticulitis within 6 months.
Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection improved quality of life in patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis but carried a 10% risk of major complications.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02174926.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Comments and Concerns on the LASER Trial.JAMA Surg. 2021 Oct 1;156(10):984. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2244. JAMA Surg. 2021. PMID: 34106225 No abstract available.
-
Comments and Concerns on the LASER Trial.JAMA Surg. 2021 Oct 1;156(10):985-986. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2250. JAMA Surg. 2021. PMID: 34106228 No abstract available.
-
Comments and Concerns on the LASER Trial.JAMA Surg. 2021 Oct 1;156(10):986. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2253. JAMA Surg. 2021. PMID: 34106231 No abstract available.
-
Comments and Concerns on the LASER Trial-Reply.JAMA Surg. 2021 Oct 1;156(10):987. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2256. JAMA Surg. 2021. PMID: 34106232 No abstract available.
-
Comments and Concerns on the LASER Trial.JAMA Surg. 2021 Oct 1;156(10):984-985. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2247. JAMA Surg. 2021. PMID: 34106248 No abstract available.
-
Patient selection for elective colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis.Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1855. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jul 2. Surgery. 2021. PMID: 34226046 No abstract available.
References
-
- Munie ST, Nalamati SPM. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of diverticular disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2018;31(4):209-213.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&li... doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607464 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mali JP, Mentula PJ, Leppäniemi AK, Sallinen VJ. Symptomatic treatment for uncomplicated acute diverticulitis: a prospective cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(6):529-534.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&li... doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000579 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Daniels L, Ünlü Ç, de Korte N, et al. ; Dutch Diverticular Disease (3D) Collaborative Study Group . Randomized clinical trial of observational versus antibiotic treatment for a first episode of CT-proven uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. Br J Surg. 2017;104(1):52-61.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&li... doi: 10.1002/bjs.10309 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chabok A, Påhlman L, Hjern F, Haapaniemi S, Smedh K; AVOD Study Group . Randomized clinical trial of antibiotics in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. Br J Surg. 2012;99(4):532-539.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&li... doi: 10.1002/bjs.8688 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sallinen VJ, Leppäniemi AK, Mentula PJ. Staging of acute diverticulitis based on clinical, radiologic, and physiologic parameters. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(3):543-551.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&li... doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000540 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
