Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2021 Apr;82(4):84-123.
doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.11.011. Epub 2020 Nov 15.

Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 re-infection with a different genotype

Affiliations
Comment

Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 re-infection with a different genotype

Philippe Colson et al. J Infect. 2021 Apr.
No abstract available

Keywords: Covid-19; Genome; Genotype; Next-generation sequencing; Re-infection; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Phylogeny reconstruction based on SARS-CoV-2 genomes recovered during the first and second infections. Phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using the MEGA X software (https://www.megasoftware.net/) based on SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences, with a total of 29,703 positions in the final dataset. This analysis incorporated the genome sequences the most similar through BLASTn searches (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch) to the two genome sequences recovered from the case-patient in April and August 2020 (indicated by a black background and a white bold font and a framed white background and a black bold font, respectively) among those obtained in our center from respiratory samples collected since end of February 2020 until end of September (indicated by a gray bold font) and those from the GISAID database (https://www.gisaid.org/) (indicated by a black bold font). Among top hit sequences from the GISAID database, a single one was kept by country. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method and Kimura 2-parameter model. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. Bootstrap greater than 50% are indicated in the tree. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. All nucleotide positions with less than 80% site coverage were discarded (partial deletion option). Prior nucleotide sequence alignment was performed using Muscle.

Comment on

References

    1. Tomassini S., Kotecha D., Bird P., Folwell A., Biju S., Tang J.W. Setting the criteria for SARS-CoV-2 reinfection – six possible cases. J Infect. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.08.011. S0163-4453(20)30546-6. Online ahead of print. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Overbaugh J. Understanding protection from SARS-CoV-2 by studying reinfection. Nat Med. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1121-z. Online ahead of print. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colson P., Lagier J.C., Baudoin J.P., Bou Khalil J., La Scola B., Raoult D., et al. Ultrarapid diagnosis, microscope imaging, genome sequencing, and culture isolation of SARS-CoV-2. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(8):1601–1603. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Colson P, Levasseur A, Delerce J, Chaudet H, Bossi V, Ben Khedher M, et al. Dramatic increase in the SARS-CoV-2 mutation rate and low mortality rate during the second epidemic in summer in Marseille. Preprint IHU 2020;doi: 10.35088/68c3-ew82. - DOI
    1. Tillett R.L., Sevinsky J.R., Hartley P.D., Kerwin H., Crawford N., Gorzalski A., et al. Genomic evidence for reinfection with SARS-CoV-2: a case study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30764-7. S1473-3099(20)30764-7. Online ahead of print. - DOI - PMC - PubMed