Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 16;17(22):8476.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228476.

Majority of New Onset of Dental Caries Occurred from Caries-Free Students: A Longitudinal Study in Primary School Students

Affiliations

Majority of New Onset of Dental Caries Occurred from Caries-Free Students: A Longitudinal Study in Primary School Students

Taro Kusama et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

We examined Rose's axiom that a large number of people exposed to a small risk may generate more cases than a small number exposed to a high risk, using data on caries incidence. This longitudinal study was based on the records of annual dental checks conducted in primary schools in Okinawa, Japan. Participants were students aged 6-11 years at baseline in 2014, and a follow-up survey was conducted after one-year. The outcome variable was the increased number of decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT). The predictor variable was the baseline DMFT score. Gender, grade, and affiliated school variables were adjusted. A negative binomial regression model was used to obtain the estimated increase of DMFT score. Among 1542 students, 1138 (73.8%) were caries-free at baseline. A total of 317 (20.6%) developed new caries during the follow-up. The predicted number of new carious teeth in a caries-free students and students with DMFT = 1 at baseline were 0.26 (95% CI, 0.22-0.31) and 0.45 teeth (95% CI, 0.33-0.56), respectively. However, among the total of 502 newly onset of carious teeth, 300 teeth (59.7%) occurred from the caries-free students at baseline. Hence, prevention strategies should target the low-risk group because they comprise the majority of the population.

Keywords: dental caries; longitudinal study; population approach; prevention paradox; universal health coverage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The participants flow for analytic sample (n = 1542).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Number of newly onset carious teeth at the one-year follow-up by DMFT at baseline. Most of the carious teeth occurred in students previously caries-free at baseline. (b) Number of participants with caries incidence during one-year follow-up by DMFT at baseline. MDFT: decayed, missing, and filled teeth.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) The number of newly onset carious teeth per participant and the total number of carious teeth by DMFT at baseline. As DMFT at baseline rises, the number of newly onset carious teeth increases. However, the total number of newly onset caries is highest in the caries-free population (DMFT = 0) at baseline. (b) Individual caries incidence and the total number of students experiencing caries incidence by DMFT at baseline. Similar to the number of newly onset carious teeth, when DMFT ≥ 1 at baseline, the individual caries incidence rate is higher than DMFT = 0. However, the total number of individual caries incidence is highest in caries-free (DMFT = 0) at baseline.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vos T., Abajobir A.A., Abate K.H., Abbafati C., Abbas K.M., Abd-Allah F., Abdulkader R.S., Abdulle A.M., Abebo T.A., Abera S.F., et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1211–1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kassebaum N.J., Smith A.G.C., Bernabe E., Fleming T.D., Reynolds A.E., Vos T., Murray C.J.L., Marcenes W. Global, Regional, and National Prevalence, Incidence, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years for Oral Conditions for 195 Countries, 1990–2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors. J. Dent. Res. 2017;96:380–387. doi: 10.1177/0022034517693566. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Listl S., Galloway J., Mossey P.A., Marcenes W. Global Economic Impact of Dental Diseases. J. Dent. Res. 2015;94:1355–1361. doi: 10.1177/0022034515602879. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Righolt A.J., Jevdjevic M., Marcenes W., Listl S. Global-, Regional-, and Country-Level Economic Impacts of Dental Diseases in 2015. J. Dent. Res. 2018;97:501–507. doi: 10.1177/0022034517750572. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macfarlane T.V., Blinkhorn A.S., Davies R.M., Kincey J., Worthington H. V Oro-facial pain in the community: Prevalence and associated impact. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2002;30:52–60. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.300108.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types