Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 16;10(11):2129.
doi: 10.3390/ani10112129.

Effects of Dog-Based Animal-Assisted Interventions in Prison Population: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Effects of Dog-Based Animal-Assisted Interventions in Prison Population: A Systematic Review

Beatriz Villafaina-Domínguez et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Animal-assisted interventions, in concrete dog-assisted intervention, have been introduced in prisons to reduce recidivism as well as to improve the well-being of prisoners. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review is to provide an up-to-date analysis of the research on the effects of dog-based animal-assisted therapy in prison population.

Methods: An electronic search of the literature was performed, and 20 articles were included. The PRISMA guideline methodology was employed.

Results: Included studies involved a total of 1577 participants. The vast majority of protocols included activities related with dog training, dog caring, or activities, which included vocational or educational components. Duration of dog-based therapies ranged between 60 and 120 min, with the frequency being between 1 and 3 days/week. Statistically significant improvements in prisoners were observed in 13 studies.

Conclusions: Dog-based animal-assisted therapy may improve anxiety, stress, recidivism, and other social variables in male or female inmates.

Keywords: animal-assisted therapy; anxiety; dog therapy; inmates; prison; recidivism; stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart for selection of studies.

References

    1. Hockenberry S., Puzzanchera C. Juvenile Court Statistics. [(accessed on 16 November 2020)];2015 Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/11212/1194.
    1. Lahey B.B., Waldman I.D., McBurnett K. Annotation: The development of antisocial behavior: An integrative causal model. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discip. 1999;40:669–682. - PubMed
    1. Goff A., Rose E., Rose S., Purves D. Does PTSD occur in sentenced prison populations? A systematic literature review. Crim. Behav. Ment. Health CBMH. 2007;17:152–162. doi: 10.1002/cbm.653. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leskelä U., Rytsälä H., Komulainen E., Melartin T., Sokero P., Lestelä-Mielonen P., Isometsä E. The influence of adversity and perceived social support on the outcome of major depressive disorder in subjects with different levels of depressive symptoms. Psychol. Med. 2006;36:779–788. - PubMed
    1. Armistead L., Wierson M., Forehand R., Frame C. Psychopathology in incarcerated juvenile delinquents: Does it extend beyond externalizing problems? Adolescence. 1992;27:309. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources