Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Nov 18:371:m4080.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4080.

First line drug treatment for hypertension and reductions in blood pressure according to age and ethnicity: cohort study in UK primary care

Affiliations
Observational Study

First line drug treatment for hypertension and reductions in blood pressure according to age and ethnicity: cohort study in UK primary care

Sarah-Jo Sinnott et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To study whether treatment recommendations based on age and ethnicity according to United Kingdom (UK) clinical guidelines for hypertension translate to blood pressure reductions in current routine clinical care.

Design: Observational cohort study.

Setting: UK primary care, from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2017.

Participants: New users of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), and thiazides.

Main outcome measures: Change in systolic blood pressure in new users of ACEI/ARB versus CCB, stratified by age (< v ≥55) and ethnicity (black v non-black), from baseline to 12, 26, and 52 week follow-up. Secondary analyses included comparisons of new users of CCB with those of thiazides. A negative outcome (herpes zoster) was used to detect residual confounding and a series of positive outcomes (expected drug effects) was used to determine whether the study design could identify expected associations.

Results: During one year of follow-up, 87 440 new users of ACEI/ARB, 67 274 new users of CCB, and 22 040 new users of thiazides were included (median 4 (interquartile range 2-6) blood pressure measurements per user). For non-black people who did not have diabetes and who were younger than 55, CCB use was associated with a larger reduction in systolic blood pressure of 1.69 mm Hg (99% confidence interval -2.52 to -0.86) relative to ACEI/ARB use at 12 weeks, and a reduction of 0.40 mm Hg (-0.98 to 0.18) in those aged 55 and older. In subgroup analyses using six finer age categories of non-black people who did not have diabetes, CCB use versus ACEI/ARB use was associated with a larger reduction in systolic blood pressure only in people aged 75 and older. Among people who did not have diabetes, systolic blood pressure decreased more with CCB use than with ACEI/ARB use in black people (reduction difference 2.15 mm Hg (-6.17 to 1.87)); the corresponding reduction difference was 0.98 mm Hg (-1.49 to -0.47) in non-black people.

Conclusions: Similar reductions in blood pressure were found to be associated with new use of CCB as with new use of ACEI/ARB in non-black people who did not have diabetes, both in those who were aged younger than 55 and those aged 55 and older. For black people without diabetes, CCB new use was associated with numerically greater reductions in blood pressure than ACEI/ARB compared with non-black people without diabetes, but the confidence intervals were overlapping for the two groups. These results suggest that the current UK algorithmic approach to first line antihypertensive treatment might not lead to greater reductions in blood pressure. Specific indications could be considered in treatment recommendations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from the Wellcome Trust for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; IJD is funded by, holds stock in, and has consulted for GlaxoSmithKline; LS has received grants from GlaxoSmithKline and has received grants from the Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, British Heart Foundation, and Diabetes UK outside of the submitted work, and is a trustee of the British Heart Foundation; S-JS, LAT, and EW have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Study flowchart. CCB=calcium channel blockers; ACEI=angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB=angiotensin receptor blockers; CPRD-GOLD=Clinical Practice Research Database; HES=Hospital Episodes Statistics; BP=blood pressure
Fig 2
Fig 2
Achieved systolic blood pressures from baseline after new use of calcium channel blockers (CCB) versus new use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) for hypertension in study groups, by study follow-up
Fig 3
Fig 3
Achieved systolic blood pressures from baseline after new use of thiazide versus calcium channel blockers (CCB) for hypertension in study groups, by study follow-up
Fig 4
Fig 4
Positive and negative outcomes for entire study population (excluding people with diabetes) in hypertension drug comparison groups matched by propensity score. Positive and negative outcomes for each group level comparison are presented in appendix 7. CCB=calcium channel blockers; ACEI=angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB=angiotensin receptor blockers
Fig 5
Fig 5
Difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) across age groups for calcium channel blockers (CCB) versus angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) and for thiazides versus CCB. Bars=99% confidence intervals

References

    1. Olsen MH, Angell SY, Asma S, et al. A call to action and a lifecourse strategy to address the global burden of raised blood pressure on current and future generations: the Lancet Commission on hypertension. Lancet 2016;388:2665-712. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31134-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management [NG136]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng136/evidence. 2019. - PubMed
    1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines [correction in: J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:2275-79]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:e127-248. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. Authors/Task Force Members 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 2018;36:1953-2041. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001940 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fretheim A, Odgaard-Jensen J, Brørs O, et al. Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis. BMC Med 2012;10:33. 10.1186/1741-7015-10-33 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances