Key role of chemistry versus bias in electrocatalytic oxygen evolution
- PMID: 33208960
- DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2908-2
Key role of chemistry versus bias in electrocatalytic oxygen evolution
Erratum in
-
Publisher Correction: Key role of chemistry versus bias in electrocatalytic oxygen evolution.Nature. 2021 Jan;589(7842):E8. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03141-3. Nature. 2021. PMID: 33402749 No abstract available.
Abstract
The oxygen evolution reaction has an important role in many alternative-energy schemes because it supplies the protons and electrons required for converting renewable electricity into chemical fuels1-3. Electrocatalysts accelerate the reaction by facilitating the required electron transfer4, as well as the formation and rupture of chemical bonds5. This involvement in fundamentally different processes results in complex electrochemical kinetics that can be challenging to understand and control, and that typically depends exponentially on overpotential1,2,6,7. Such behaviour emerges when the applied bias drives the reaction in line with the phenomenological Butler-Volmer theory, which focuses on electron transfer8, enabling the use of Tafel analysis to gain mechanistic insight under quasi-equilibrium9-11 or steady-state assumptions12. However, the charging of catalyst surfaces under bias also affects bond formation and rupture13-15, the effect of which on the electrocatalytic rate is not accounted for by the phenomenological Tafel analysis8 and is often unknown. Here we report pulse voltammetry and operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurements on iridium oxide to show that the applied bias does not act directly on the reaction coordinate, but affects the electrocatalytically generated current through charge accumulation in the catalyst. We find that the activation free energy decreases linearly with the amount of oxidative charge stored, and show that this relationship underlies electrocatalytic performance and can be evaluated using measurement and computation. We anticipate that these findings and our methodology will help to better understand other electrocatalytic materials and design systems with improved performance.
References
-
- Gür, T. M. Review of electrical energy storage technologies, materials and systems: challenges and prospects for large-scale grid storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 2696–2767 (2018); correction 11, 3055–3055 (2018). - DOI
-
- Seh, Z. W. et al. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: insights into materials design. Science 355, eaad4998 (2017). - DOI
-
- Hu, C., Zhang, L. & Gong, J. Recent progress made in the mechanism comprehension and design of electrocatalysts for alkaline water splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 2620–2645 (2019). - DOI
-
- Marcus, R. A. Electron transfer reactions in chemistry. Theory and experiment. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 599–610 (1993). - DOI
-
- Marcus, R. A. Theoretical relations among rate constants, barriers, and Brønsted slopes of chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 72, 891–899 (1968). - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
