Perioperative Analgesic Modalities for Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 33209056
- PMCID: PMC7669532
- DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S274808
Perioperative Analgesic Modalities for Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Purpose: Various analgesic modalities are adopted for perioperative analgesia in breast cancer surgeries. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intravenous morphine versus serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in breast cancer surgeries.
Patients and methods: Seventy-five breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy from January 2020 to June 2020 were randomly allocated into 3 groups; the morphine group received morphine 0.1 mg/kg, the SAPB group received ultrasound-guided SAPB with 25 mL bupivacaine 0.25% and the ESPB group received ultrasound-guided ESPB with 25 mL bupivacaine 0.25%. A visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-10 was used to evaluate pain postoperatively, where 0 denotes no pain and 10 worst pain. If any patient in the 3 studied groups reported breakthrough pain with VAS ≥ 4 then a bolus of 3 mg morphine was given.
Results: There was no difference in VAS scores between the 3 groups postoperatively. Morphine consumption was higher in the morphine group (9.19 ± 2.32 mg) than the SAPB group (4.00 ± 1.55 mg) and the ESPB group (4.20 ± 1.64 mg), respectively. First time to receive postoperative morphine was significantly longer for the ESPB and SAPB groups than the morphine group (20.40 ± 4.98 hours), (19.00 ± 5.9 hours), (5.00 ± 4.62 hours), respectively. Intraoperative hemodynamics and fentanyl consumption showed no difference between groups, whereas postoperative mean arterial blood pressure values at 2 and 4 hours were higher in the morphine group. Ramsay sedation score and postoperative nausea and vomiting values in the post anesthesia care unit were higher for the morphine group compared to the SAPB and ESPB groups. No complications related to the blocks were reported.
Conclusion: SAPB and ESPB can be used as an effective and safe alternative to opioids with fewer side effects in breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.
Trial registration: This trial was prospectively registered at Clinical Trials.gov on 22 January 2020 with registration number NCT04248608 (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0009JS5&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0004LIG&ts=7&cx=-81xkwa).
Keywords: erector spinae block; modified radical mastectomy; morphine; serratus plane block.
© 2020 Elsabeeny et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures









Similar articles
-
[Comparison of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane blockperioperatively in radical mastectomy].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 18;99(23):1809-1813. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.23.012. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31207693 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Analgesic Effect of Addition of Pectointercostal Block to Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Breast Surgeries: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.Pain Physician. 2023 Oct;26(6):E679-E685. Pain Physician. 2023. PMID: 37847921 Clinical Trial.
-
Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Perioperative Thoracotomy Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Study.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Oct;35(10):2928-2936. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.12.047. Epub 2021 Jan 4. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021. PMID: 33483269 Clinical Trial.
-
Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Feb 20;21(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01277-x. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021. PMID: 33610172 Free PMC article.
-
Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block versus serratus anterior plane block in breast surgery-a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024 Dec 18;4(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s44158-024-00218-7. J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 39695870 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Role of bilevel erector spinae with high thoracic block vs conventional unilevel block in analgesia and reduction of pain in axilla in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial.Pain Rep. 2025 Jan 13;10(1):e1234. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001234. eCollection 2025 Feb. Pain Rep. 2025. PMID: 39816904 Free PMC article.
-
The Utility of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Breast Surgery: A Practical Review.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Apr 2;13(4):e6667. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006667. eCollection 2025 Apr. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025. PMID: 40182301 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Analgesia and spread of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial.BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Oct 17;22(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01860-w. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022. PMID: 36253729 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Utilization of Ultrasound-Guided Regional Nerve Blocks in Anesthetic Management for Fracture Surgery.J Pain Res. 2025 Jan 20;18:353-366. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S492151. eCollection 2025. J Pain Res. 2025. PMID: 39867533 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of combined superficial and deep serratus anterior plane block versus pectoserratus plane block following modified radical mastectomy surgery.BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03213-9. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025. PMID: 40721998 Free PMC article.
References
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical