Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;11(5):880-893.
doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-197.

Rectal cancer in young patients: incidence and outcome disparities

Affiliations

Rectal cancer in young patients: incidence and outcome disparities

Thomas J Quinn et al. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Background: There is an alarming rise in incidence among young patients with rectal cancer. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Analysis (SEER) databases may help identify population level disparities in incidence and cancer-related outcomes.

Methods: A total of 197,178 patients within the SEER 18 registry and 221,886 patients from the NCDB database with rectal cancer were evaluated in this retrospective cohort study. The analyzed cohort consisted of young (<50), white or African American patients. Indication bias was mitigated by conducting inverse probability of treatment weighted analysis using binary logistic regression modeling to determine propensity score for being white or African American.

Results: A total of 6,144 young patients were identified from the SEER 18 registry and a total of 17,819 young patients were identified from the NCDB. From 1990 to 2016, there was a significant change in rectal cancer incidence, with a steadily increasing APC of 3.06 (P<0.05). The was no overall change in age-adjusted APC among young African American patients (APC 0.00, P=1); however, there was a significant increase among young white patients (APC 2.97, P<0.05). There was an increased incidence for both stage III and IV among young rectal cancer patients, with an age-adjusted APC of 5.35 and 3.83, respectively (P<0.05). After propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting, young African Americans had worse overall survival in both the NCDB and SEER (HR 1.1-1.3, P<0.05) databases. This disparity was also seen for cancer-specific survival (HR 1.5, P=0.002).

Conclusions: The current study adds to the growing body of literature demonstrating an alarming increase in incidence of rectal cancer among young patients. Moreover, the incidence appears to be increasing particularly among young white patients and driven by stage III disease.

Keywords: Rectal neoplasms; adjuvant; chemoradiotherapy; chemotherapy; cohort studies; propensity score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jgo-20-197). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram demonstrating the inclusion and exclusion criteria used to select young rectal cancer patients using SEER 18 (A) and NCDB (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Age-adjusted annual percent change of incidence among young (<50) rectal cancer patients using the SEER 9 (A) and SEER 18 (B) registries. Age-adjusted annual percent change of incidence among young rectal cancer patients using the SEER 18 registry, stratified by race (C) and stage at diagnosis (D).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall survival for young rectal cancer patients, stratified by stage, in NCDB (A,C,E,G) and SEER 18 (B,D,F,H), after propensity score matching with inverse probability of treatment weighting.
Figure S1
Figure S1
Age-adjusted annual percent change of incidence in young rectal cancer using the SEER 18 registry for white (A) and African American (B) patients, stratified by stage at diagnosis.
Figure S2
Figure S2
Cancer-specific survival for young rectal cancer patients in SEER 18, stratified by stage I (A), II (B), III (C), and IV (D) after propensity score matching with inverse probability of treatment weighting.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:7-30. 10.3322/caac.21442 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilbertsen VA, Nelms JM. The prevention of invasive cancer of the rectum. Cancer 1978;41:1137-9. 10.1002/1097-0142(197803)41:3<1137::AID-CNCR2820410350>3.0.CO;2-G - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977-81. 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Anderson WF, et al. Colorectal Cancer Incidence Patterns in the United States, 1974-2013. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017;109:djw322. 10.1093/jnci/djw322 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:177-93. 10.3322/caac.21395 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources