Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;11(5):911-917.
doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-393.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of patients with early colorectal carcinoma and precancerous lesions

Affiliations

Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of patients with early colorectal carcinoma and precancerous lesions

Jing Yu et al. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Our study aims to explore the indications and clinical efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) on the early colorectal carcinoma and precancerous lesions.

Methods: The clinical data of 29 patients with early colorectal carcinoma and precancerous lesions who were treated with ESD at Nantong First People's Hospital between January 2018 and December 2019 were collected. Then the endoscopic morphology, postoperative pathological classification, tumor resection rate, postoperative complications, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Colorectal carcinoma lesions were distributed in the left colon, accounting for 89.6%. There were 14 cases (48.3%) with protuberant endoscopic tumors, accounting for the highest proportion, while 2 cases (6.9%) of the flat tumors, accounting for the lowest proportion. The average operation time for ESD was 123 minutes, and en-bloc resection was 100% while the curative resection rate was 89.6%. There were 3 cases (10.3%) with delayed hemorrhage after ESD, and 1 case with persistent hemorrhage during the operation was transferred to surgical treatment. No cases with infection or perforation after ESD. For postoperative pathological classification, villous-tubular adenoma with low-grade epithelioma accounted for 31%; tubular adenoma with high-grade epithelioma only accounted for 3.4%. There was no recurrence in the follow-up for 1-20 months.

Conclusions: Control of surgical indications strictly, improvement of operation skills, attention to postoperative pathological feedback, and close follow-up are necessary guarantees to improve the clinical effectiveness of ESD.

Keywords: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); clinical experience; early colorectal carcinoma and precancerous lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jgo-20-393). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) treatment and postoperative review of rectal mucosal protuberant lesions. A male patient, 60 years old. (A) 2.0 cm × 1.0 cm mass was observed under the endoscope; (B) 0.5 cm outside the edge of indigo carmine staining was marked; (C) the marked points were first separated outwards with a single-use Dualknife, and then flossing traction stripped the mucosa; (D) the wound surface was treated with the hot biopsy forceps; (E) the specimen was paved and soaked in formaldehyde. Its postoperative pathology shows villous tubular adenoma with low-grade epithelial neoplasia with negative horizontal resection margins. (F,G) After 12 months, no abnormal vessels were observed under linked color imaging (LCI) and blue laser imaging (BLI).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dekker E, Tanis PJ, Vleugels JLA, et al. Colorectal cancer. Lancet 2019;394:1467-80. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. He L, Wang F, Tian H, et al. The expression profile of RNA sensors in colorectal cancer and its correlation with cancer stages. Transl Cancer Res 2019;8:1351-63. 10.21037/tcr.2019.07.45 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017;49:270-97. 10.1055/s-0043-102569 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raju GS, Lum PJ, Ross WA, et al. Outcome of EMR as an alternative to surgery in patients with complex colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2016;84:315-25. 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.067 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Law R, Das A, Gregory D, et al. Endoscopic resection is cost-effective compared with laparoscopic resection in the management of complex colon polyps: an economic analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2016;83:1248-57. 10.1016/j.gie.2015.11.014 - DOI - PubMed