Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;30(3):348-354.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8674. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

Evaluating the National Institutes of Health's Sex as a Biological Variable Policy: Conflicting Accounts from the Front Lines of Animal Research

Affiliations

Evaluating the National Institutes of Health's Sex as a Biological Variable Policy: Conflicting Accounts from the Front Lines of Animal Research

Margaret Waltz et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Since the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Revitalization Act of 1993, focus on the equitable inclusion of women in clinical research has been ongoing. NIH's 2015 sex as a biological variable (SABV) policy aims to transform research design, analysis, and reporting in the preclinical sphere by including male and female organisms in vertebrate animal research as well as human studies. However, questions remain regarding how researchers and members of research oversight committees perceive the value and need of the SABV policy. Materials and Methods: Based on 62 interviews with animal researchers and oversight personnel, we analyze what the animal research community knows about the policy and sees as the benefits and challenges of implementation. Results: We found that the 62 interviewees disagreed about the need for the policy, with some being supportive and others questioning whether the policy is based on science or is politically motivated. There were also tensions in how interviewees conceptualized the challenges to and resources needed for implementing the SABV policy. For instance, while some thought implementation would require a significant increase in numbers of animals used for each study, others explicitly rejected this claim. Conclusions: We conclude by discussing the practical and social implications of our findings about the views of members of the animal research community regarding the SABV policy.

Keywords: National Institutes of Health; animal researchers; policy; preclinical research; sex as a biological variable; women's health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arnegard ME, Whitten LA, Hunter C, Clayton JA. Sex as a biological variable: A 5-year progress report and call to action. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2020;29:858–864 - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institutes of Health. Consideration of sex as a biological variable in NIH-funded Research, 2015. Available at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-15-102.html Accessed September17, 2020
    1. Regensteiner JG, Libby AM, Begg L, Ghim M, Clayton JA. Sex as a biological variable: The importance of curriculum development in the 21st century. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2020;29:854–857 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roth D. Gender bias in clinical drug trials. Wisconsin J Law Gend Soc 2018;33:83–105
    1. Pinnow E, Sharma P, Parekh A, Gevorkian N, Uhl K. Increasing participation of women in early phase clinical trials approved by the FDA. Womens Health Issues 2009;19:89–93 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources