Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;9(3):1338-1346.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.10.063. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

Penicillin Allergy Assessment in Pregnancy: Safety and Impact on Antibiotic Use

Affiliations

Penicillin Allergy Assessment in Pregnancy: Safety and Impact on Antibiotic Use

Anna R Wolfson et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Penicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics are recommended for group B Streptococcus and cesarean section prophylaxis, but approximately 10% of pregnant patients report a penicillin allergy.

Objective: To assess the safety and impact of penicillin allergy evaluation in pregnant patients.

Methods: In this retrospective study of obstetrician-ordered Allergy/Immunology (AI) electronic consultations (e-consults) from September 20, 2017 through December 31, 2019, we reviewed the electronic health record for e-consult recommendation; patient demographic, obstetric, and allergy histories; and peripartum antibiotic utilization with indication. For patients whose electronic consultation recommended an in-person AI evaluation, testing outcomes were determined, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare antibiotic use between patients who did and did not receive an in-person AI evaluation.

Results: Of 389 obstetrician-ordered e-consults, 363 (93%) recommended an in-person AI evaluation; of these, 222 (61%) patients received an in-person AI evaluation. Of 220 (99%) patients skin tested, 209 (95%) had their penicillin allergy label safely removed. Compared with patients who did not receive an in-person AI evaluation despite it being recommended (n = 141), patients with in-person AI evaluation (n = 222) had reduced peripartum vancomycin (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.33), clindamycin (aOR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.08-0.34), and gentamicin (aOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.78) use and increased penicillin (aOR, 18.0; 95% CI, 6.30-51.2) use. The fully AI evaluated patients had increased first-line antibiotic prophylaxis for group B Streptococcus (aOR, 26.9; 95% CI, 6.32-114) and cesarean section (aOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.06-3.52).

Conclusions: In a sample of 220 pregnant patients with penicillin allergy histories and in-person AI evaluation, penicillin allergy testing was safe and associated with significantly reduced broad-spectrum antibiotic use and increased first-line beta-lactam antibiotic use.

Keywords: Adverse drug reaction; Antibiotic; C-section; Cephalosporin; Drug challenge; E-consult; Group B Streptococcus; Hypersensitivity; Penicillin; Skin test; Stewardship; Telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest:

KGB and ESS report a licensed clinical decision support tool for inpatient beta-lactam allergy evaluation. NAP reports spousal employment by Chiesi Farmaceutici. ARW, CM, WA, XF, ASB, and AB have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of Allergy/Immunology (AI) e-consults and In-Person Consults for Obstetric Patients with Reported Penicillin Allergy * 1 patient with selective aminopenicillin allergy and 1 patient delabeleld based on history 1 patient had a recent reaction and 1 patient had severe cutaneous adverse reaction; these reactions were not appropriately documented in the electronic health record. 1 patient with positive intradermal test to ampicillin, 1 patient with positive intradermal test to benzylpenicilloyl polylysine, and 1 patient with subjective symptoms (sensation of throat/tongue swelling) during skin testing 2 patients deferred challenge due to anxiety, 2 physicians deferred challenge due to recent or severe reactions not known from documentation in the electronic health record. Abbreviations: AI, Allergy/Immunology; e-Consult, electronic consult
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Antibiotic Utilization in Obstetric Patients with Reported Penicillin Allergy. This figure demonstrates antibiotic use and its associated timing (pregnancy, delivery, post partum) for each group of obstetric patients who received an e-consult. Beta-lactams, beta-lactam alternatives, and both are indicated by color according to the frequency of their use. Abbreviations: AI, Allergy/Immunology; e-Consult, electronic consult
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Antibiotic Utilization for Group B Streptococcus and C-Section Prophylaxis in Obstetric Patients with Reported Penicillin Allergy. This figure demonstrates patients who ultimately had GBS or C-sections with their associated antibiotic use. *Penicillin for Group B Strep and cefazolin for C-section surgical site infection prophylaxis Abbreviations: AI, Allergy/Immunology; e-Consult, electronic consult; Group B Strep, Group B Streptococcus; C-section, Caesarian section.

Comment in

References

    1. Shenoy ES, Macy E, Rowe T, Blumenthal KG. Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review. JAMA 2019;321:188–99. - PubMed
    1. Macy E, Contreras R. Health Care Use and Serious Infection Prevalence Associated with Penicillin “Allergy” in Hospitalized Patients: A Cohort Study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133:790–6. - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal KG, Parker RA, Shenoy ES, Walensky RP. Improving Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Reported Penicillin Allergy. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:741–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal KG, Lu N, Zhang Y, Li Y, Walensky RP, Choi HK. Risk of Meticillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile in Patients with a Documented Penicillin Allergy: Population Based Matched Cohort Study. BMJ. 2018;361:k2400. - PMC - PubMed
    1. T’Ao J, Sung C. Stillbirth Caused by Intradermal Penicillin Hypersensitivity Test. Chin Med J. 1958;76:174–7. - PubMed

Publication types