Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with left bundle branch block with residual conduction
- PMID: 33212244
- PMCID: PMC7854372
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2020.10.006
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with left bundle branch block with residual conduction
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate whether left bundle branch block with residual conduction (rLBBB) is associated with worse outcomes after cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT).
Methods: All consecutive CRT implants at our institution between 2006 and 2013 were identified from our local device registry. Pre- and post-implant patient specific data were extracted from clinical records.
Results: A total of 690 CRT implants were identified during the study period. Prior to CRT, 52.2% of patients had true left bundle branch block (LBBB), 19.1% a pacing-induced LBBB (pLBBB), 11.2% a rLBBB, 0.8% a right bundle branch block (RBBB), and 16.5% had a nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) electrocardiogram pattern. Mean age at implant was 67.5 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.6), mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) was 25.7% (SD = 7.9%), and mean QRS duration was 158.4 ms (SD = 32 ms). After CRT, QRS duration was significantly reduced in the LBBB (p < 0.001), pLBBB (p < 0.001), rLBBB (p < 0.001), RBBB (p = 0.04), and IVCD groups (p = 0.03). LV EF significantly improved in the LBBB (p < 0.001), rLBBB (p = 0.002), and pLBBB (p < 0.001) groups, but the RBBB and IVCD groups showed no improvement. There was no significant difference in mortality between the LBBB and rLBBB groups. LV EF post-CRT, chronic kidney disease, hyperkalaemia, hypernatremia, and age at implant were significant predictors of mortality.
Conclusion: CRT in patients with rLBBB results in improved LV EF and similar mortality rates to CRT patients with complete LBBB. Predictors of mortality post-CRT include post-CRT LV EF, presence of CKD, hyperkalaemia, hypernatremia, and older age at implant.
Keywords: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy; Heart failure; Left bundle branch block; Left bundle branch block with residual conduction.
Copyright © 2020 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest None.
Figures
References
-
- Zareba W., Klein H., Cygankiewicz I., Hall W.J., McNitt S., Brown M. Effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy by QRS morphology in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT) Circulation. 2011;123:1061–1072. - PubMed
-
- Hsu J.C., Solomon S.D., Bourgoun M., McNitt S., Goldenberg I., Klein H. Predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and associated improvement in clinical outcome: the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:2366–2373. - PubMed
-
- Moss A.J., Hall W.J., Cannom D.S., Klein H., Brown M.W., Daubert J.P. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1329–1338. - PubMed
-
- Ponikowski P., Voors A.A., Anker S.D., Bueno H., Cleland J.G.F., Coats A.J.S. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2016. 2016;37:2129–2200. - PubMed
-
- Zhang Q., Fung J.W., Auricchio A., Chan J.Y., Kum L.C., Wu L.W. Differential change in left ventricular mass and regional wall thickness after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1423–1430. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials