Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 17;12(11):1101.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12111101.

Microneedles Drug Delivery Systems for Treatment of Cancer: A Recent Update

Affiliations
Review

Microneedles Drug Delivery Systems for Treatment of Cancer: A Recent Update

Aravindram Attiguppe Seetharam et al. Pharmaceutics. .

Abstract

Microneedles (MNs) are tiny needle like structures used in drug delivery through layers of the skin. They are non-invasive and are associated with significantly less or no pain at the site of administration to the skin. MNs are excellent in delivering both small and large molecules to the subjects in need thereof. There exist several strategies for drug delivery using MNs, wherein each strategy has its pros and cons. Research in this domain lead to product development and commercialization for clinical use. Additionally, several MN-based products are undergoing clinical trials to evaluate its safety, efficacy, and tolerability. The present review begins by providing bird's-eye view about the general characteristics of MNs followed by providing recent updates in the treatment of cancer using MNs. Particularly, we provide an overview of various aspects namely: anti-cancerous MNs that work based on sensor technology, MNs for treatment of breast cancer, skin carcinoma, prostate cancer, and MNs fabricated by additive manufacturing or 3 dimensional printing for treatment of cancer. Further, the review also provides limitations, safety concerns, and latest updates about the clinical trials on MNs for the treatment of cancer. Furthermore, we also provide a regulatory overview from the "United States Food and Drug Administration" about MNs.

Keywords: breast cancer; non-invasive; regulatory; skin carcinoma; transdermal drug delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
History of Microneedles (MNs) (a) Plan view of the microneedle device from reference [36] (bd) Plan view of microneedle device, substantially to scale, blown-up to shown the MNs from reference [37] (e) MNs patented by Alza Corporation, from reference [38].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Strategies for drug delivery using MNs (a) “Poke and Patch” Strategy (b) “Coat and Poke” Strategy (c) “Poke and Release” Strategy [30,56,57,58] (d) “Poke and Flow” Strategy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic illustration of general characteristics of MNs.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Design and geometry of MNs (a) Illustration of geometrical parameters in a microneedle array (b) Geometry of MNs length (L), thickness (T) and width (W) (c) Different shapes of MNs (i) Rectangular microneedle with sharp edge (ii) cylindrical (iii) conical (iv) tapered (v) arrow headed.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Microneedles (MNs) sensing modalities (a) sensor positioned on the MNs base or support (b) electrode inserted into the hollow microneedles—acts electrochemically (c) surface of the MNs is functionalized to act as a sensor (d) MNs are metallized to act as bio-electrodes.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Microneedles for treatment of cancer (a) Illustration showing MNs with sensor unit when applied to skin (b) Microneedle array device with probe (c) Light emitting fiber optic microneedle converting 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) to Protoporphyrin IX (PPIX).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Honokiol: Biphenyl natural anti-cancer compound from Magnolia glandiflora.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Cross-section of the microneedle after drug cargo loading by micro-milling.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Advantages of MNs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. MacGregor R.R., Graziani A.L. Oral Administration of Antibiotics: A Rational Alternative to the Parenteral Route. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1997;24:457–467. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.3.457. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Darji M.A., Lalge R.M., Marathe S.P., Mulay T.D., Fatima T., Alshammari A., Lee H.K., Repka M.A., Murthy S.N. Excipient Stability in Oral Solid Dosage Forms: A Review. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017;19:12–26. doi: 10.1208/s12249-017-0864-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersen O., Zweidorff O.K., Hjelde T., Rodland E.A. Problemer med å svelgetabletter. Spørreundersøkelse fra allmennpraksis. Problems when swallowing tablets. A questionnaire study from general practice. TidsskrNorLaegeforen. 1995;115:947–949. - PubMed
    1. Maderuelo C., Lanao J.M., Zarzuelo A. Enteric coating of oral solid dosage forms as a tool to improve drug bioavailability. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019;138:105019. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.105019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pond S.M., Tozer T.N. First-pass elimination. Basic concepts and clinical consequences. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 1984;9:1–25. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198409010-00001. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources