Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 17;12(11):3408.
doi: 10.3390/cancers12113408.

Continuous 14 Day Infusional Ifosfamide for Management of Soft-Tissue and Bone Sarcoma: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Affiliations

Continuous 14 Day Infusional Ifosfamide for Management of Soft-Tissue and Bone Sarcoma: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Thomas J Carter et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Ifosfamide is used to treat soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) and bone sarcoma (BS), with improved efficacy at doses above 9 g/m2/cycle. To mitigate treatment-associated toxicity with higher doses, continuous infusional ifosfamide is increasingly used. However, clinical outcome data remain limited. Single-centre retrospective analysis of patients treated with four-weekly infusional ifosfamide (14 g/m2/14d) between August 2012 and February 2019 was conducted. Radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were evaluated. Eighty patients were treated-46 with STS and 34 with BS. Patients received a median of three cycles of infusional ifosfamide (1-24). Overall disease control rate (DCR) in STS was 50% (23 of 46 patients), with a median PFS of 3.8 months, and median OS of 13.0 months. In synovial sarcoma (SS), DCR was 80% (12/15), median PFS 8.1 months and median OS 20.9 months. Overall DCR in BS (34 patients) was 30%, with a median PFS of 2.5 months and median OS of 6.2 months. Five patients (6%) stopped treatment due to toxicity alone within the first two cycles. A further 10 patients stopped treatment due to toxicity during later treatment cycles (12%) and 18 patients (23%) required dose modification. Forty-five patients (56%) experienced grade (G) 3/4 haematological toxicity, with 12 episodes of febrile neutropenia and one treatment-related death. Twenty-seven patients (34%) experienced G3/4 non-haematological toxicity, most commonly nausea and vomiting (10, 13%). In summary, infusional ifosfamide has efficacy in STS, most notable in SS. Benefit appears limited in BS. Treatment is associated with toxicity that requires specialist supportive care.

Keywords: bone sarcoma; chemotherapy; infusional ifosfamide; soft-tissue sarcoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves showing PFS (left) and OS (right) for all 80 patients—46 patients with STS and 34 with BS. Median PFS was 3.4 months and median OS was 11.8 months.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves showing PFS and OS in patients with STS. (A) All STS patients; (B) compared by histological subtype; (C) compared by prior ifosfamide exposure; (D) compared based on the number of previous chemotherapy lines. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) for each subgroup are shown. SS = synovial sarcoma, LPS = liposarcoma. Statistical analysis was performed using log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test to compare survival curves. * Statistically significant difference between KM curves.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Swimmer plot of STS cohort demonstrating PFS, timing of treatment cessation, and patient status at the time of analysis. Patients 1–15 represent those with synovial sarcoma, patients 16–28 represent those with liposarcoma, whilst patients 19–46 represent those with other STS subtypes.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves showing PFS and OS in patients with BS. (A) All BS patients; (B) compared by histological subtype; (C) compared by prior ifosfamide exposure; (D) compared based on the number of previous chemotherapy lines. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) for each subgroup are shown. ES = Ewing sarcoma. Statistical analysis was performed using log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test to compare survival curves.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Swimmer plot of BS cohort demonstrating PFS and timing of treatment termination, along with details of their current status at the time of analysis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tascilar M., Loos W.J., Seynaeve C., Verweij J., Sleijfer S. The Pharmacologic Basis of Ifosfamide Use in Adult Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Oncologist. 2007;12:1351–1360. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-11-1351. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seddon B. First-line treatment in advanced or metastatic disease: One size fits all or adapted to specific histiotypes? Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2016;28:323–330. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000301. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Judson I., Verweij J., Gelderblom H., Hartmann J.T., Schöffski P., Blay J.-Y., Kerst J.M., Sufliarsky J., Whelan J., Hohenberger P., et al. Doxorubicin alone versus intensified doxorubicin plus ifosfamide for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma: A randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:415–423. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70063-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaspar N., Hawkins D.S., Dirksen U., Lewis I.J., Ferrari S., Le Deley M.-C., Kovar H., Grimer R., Whelan J., Claude L., et al. Ewing Sarcoma: Current Management and Future Approaches Through Collaboration. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33:3036–3046. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.5256. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Isakoff M.S., Bielack S.S., Meltzer P.S., Gorlick R. Osteosarcoma: Current Treatment and a Collaborative Pathway to Success. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33:3029–3035. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4895. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources