Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 17;17(22):8529.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228529.

The Impact of the Environment on the Quality of Life and the Mediating Effects of Sleep and Stress

Affiliations

The Impact of the Environment on the Quality of Life and the Mediating Effects of Sleep and Stress

Katherine Ka Pik Chang et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

(1) Background: Environment is an independent factor that affects one's quality of life (QoL), where studies suggest that health behaviours also affect one's quality of life. The purpose of the present study was to examine the association between environmental conditions and QoL and how individual health behaviours affect this association. (2) Methods: Participants aged 20 or above were recruited from 11 tertiary planning units in the central part of Kowloon. These tertiary planning units were selected as they represented the overall living environment in Hong Kong, with a mix of the poorer urban areas alongside relatively affluent districts. A mediation analysis was implemented using multiple linear regressions to examine the effects of environmental conditions on QoL. (3) Results: Of the 607 eligible participants included for analysis, 390 were female and 217 were male, with a mean age of 47.4 years. Living within 500 m of a green space area had benefits on the physical aspect of QoL and physical activity but no effect on the psychological aspect of QoL. Moderate satisfaction with public spaces affected QoL positively. In contrast, less satisfaction with public spaces affected QoL negatively in both physical and psychological aspects through the mediating effect of stress. Poor environmental quality affected all domains of QoL negatively through the mediating effects of increased stress and poor sleep. (4) Conclusions: Environment is an important factor that affects individuals' overall well-being. The interaction between environmental conditions and individual variables, especially perceived stress and sleep, is extremely important when assessing its impact on QoL. The findings of this study support the importance of individual stress and sleep in mediating the relationship between the environment and QoL for health. Further studies should be conducted to include objective measurements, such as those of cortisol levels for stress and physical fitness tests.

Keywords: environment; quality of life; sleep; stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mediation model for physical QoL. The analyses controlled for fruit intake and vegetable intake. Unstandardised coefficients are displayed. The values indicate the strength of the relationship between the variables. Red arrows depict positive relationships, blue arrows show negative relationships and grey arrows depict non-significance. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mediation model for psychological QoL. The analyses controlled for fruit intake and vegetable intake. Unstandardised coefficients are displayed. The values indicate the strength of the relationship between variables. Red arrows depict positive relationships, blue arrows show negative relationships and grey arrows depict non-significance. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mediation model for social QoL. The analyses controlled for fruit intake, vegetable intake, gender and chronic illness. Unstandardised coefficients are displayed. The values indicate the strength of the relationship between variables. Red arrows depict positive relationships, blue arrows show negative relationships and grey arrows depict non-significance. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mediation model for environmental QoL. The analyses controlled for fruit intake and education level. Unstandardised coefficients are displayed. The values indicate the strength of the relationship between variables. Red arrows depict positive relationships, blue arrows show negative relationships and grey arrows depict non-significance. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The WHOQOL Group The world health organization quality of life assessment (WHO QOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Soc. Sci. Med. 1998;46:1569–1585. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ware J.E., Gandek B., Kosinski M., Aaronson N.K., Apolone G., Brazier J., Bullinger M., Kaasa S., Leplège A., Prieto L., et al. The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA project, International Quality of Life Assessment. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1998;51:1167–1170. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00108-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organisation WHOQOL-BREF Introduction, Administration, Scoring and Generic Version of the Assessment, 1996. [(accessed on 8 August 2018)]; Available online: http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/76.pdf.
    1. Hsiao Y.Y., Wu C.H., Yao G. Convergent and discriminant validity of the WHOQOLBREF using a multitrait-multimethod approach. Soc. Indic. Res. 2014;116:971–988. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0313-z. - DOI
    1. Ferrans C.E., Zerwic J.J., Wilbur J.E., Larson J.L. Conceptual model of health-related quality of life. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2005;37:336–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00058.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types