Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;5(11):e003116.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003116.

Solving the problem of access to cardiovascular medicines: revolving fund pharmacy models in rural western Kenya

Affiliations

Solving the problem of access to cardiovascular medicines: revolving fund pharmacy models in rural western Kenya

Dan N Tran et al. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Availability of medicines for treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is low in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC). Supply chain models to improve the availability of quality CVD medicines in LMIC communities are urgently required. Our team established contextualised revolving fund pharmacies (RFPs) in rural western Kenya, whereby an initial stock of essential medicines was obtained through donations or purchase and then sold at a small mark-up price sufficient to replenish drug stock and ensure sustainability. In response to different contexts and levels of the public health system in Kenya (eg, primary versus tertiary), we developed and implemented three contextualised models of RFPs over the past decade, creating a network of 72 RFPs across western Kenya, that supplied 22 categories of CVD medicines and increased availability of essential CVD medications from <30% to 90% or higher. In one representative year, we were able to successfully supply 5 793 981 units of CVD and diabetes medicines to patients in western Kenya. The estimated programme running cost was US$6.5-25 per patient, serving as a useful benchmark for public governments to invest in medication supply chain systems in LMICs going forward. One important lesson that we have learnt from implementing three different RFP models over the past 10 years has been that each model has its own advantages and disadvantages, and we must continue to stay nimble and modify as needed to determine the optimal supply chain model while ensuring consistent access to essential CVD medications for patients living in these settings.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; descriptive study; diabetes; health services research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Sonak Pastakia serves as a consultant for Abbott and Becton Dickinson on work unrelated to the study being presented here. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A schematic description of the flow of RFP-supplied CVD medications across different levels of health facilities. The above numbers represent medication units (ie, tablets, capsules or vials for insulin). Model 1=community-managed RFPs, Model 2=AMPATH-managed RFPs, Model 3=facility-managed RFPs. Level 1=community-based care program, Level 2=dispensaries, Level 3=health centres, Level 4=subcounty hospitals, Level 5=county hospitals, Level 6=tertiary referral hospitals. ACEIs, angiotensin-converting enzymes inhibitors; AMPATH, The Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare; APA, antiplatelet agents; ARBs, angiotensin-II receptor blockers; BB, beta blockers; CCB, calcium channel blockers; CVD, cardiovascular disease; INS, insulin; LD, loop diuretics; OHA, oral hypoglycaemia agents; RFP, revolving fund pharmacy; STA, statin; TD, thiazide diuretics.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average availability of tracer CVD medicines across different levels of health facilities for RFP Model 1 (community-managed RFPs) and Model 2 (AMPATH-managed RFPs). Level 2=dispensaries, Level 3=health centres, Level 4=subcounty hospitals, Level 5=county hospitals, Level 6=tertiary referral hospitals. AMPATH, The Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare; CVD, cardiovascular disease; RFP, revolving fund pharmacy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Average availability of tracer CVD medicines across RFP Model 1 (community-managed RFPs) and Model 2 (AMPATH-managed RFPs). AMPATH, The Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare; CVD, cardiovascular disease; RFP, revolving fund pharmacy.

References

    1. Khatib R, McKee M, Shannon H, et al. . Availability and affordability of cardiovascular disease medicines and their effect on use in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: an analysis of the pure study data. Lancet 2016;387:61–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00469-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tran DN, Njuguna B, Mercer T, et al. . Ensuring patient-centered access to cardiovascular disease medicines in low-income and middle-income countries through Health-System strengthening. Cardiol Clin 2017;35:125–34. 10.1016/j.ccl.2016.08.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daivadanam M, Ingram M, Sidney Annerstedt K, et al. . The role of context in implementation research for non-communicable diseases: Answering the 'how-to' dilemma. PLoS One 2019;14:e0214454. 10.1371/journal.pone.0214454 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. GBD 2016 Causes of Death Collaborators Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet 2017;390:1151–210. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roth GA, Huffman MD, Moran AE, et al. . Global and regional patterns in cardiovascular mortality from 1990 to 2013. Circulation 2015;132:1667–78. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008720 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources