Comparison of 1-Year Outcomes Between Small Incision Lenticule Extraction With Prophylactic Cross-Linking and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis With Prophylactic Cross-Linking
- PMID: 33214416
- DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002547
Comparison of 1-Year Outcomes Between Small Incision Lenticule Extraction With Prophylactic Cross-Linking and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis With Prophylactic Cross-Linking
Abstract
Purpose: To compare small incision lenticule extraction with prophylactic cross-linking (SMILE Xtra) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with prophylactic cross-linking (FS-LASIK Xtra) in their safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability.
Methods: This is a prospective cohort study. Forty-eight eyes subjected to SMILE Xtra and 90 eyes subjected to FS-LASIK Xtra were enrolled. The enrolled eyes exhibited either borderline corneal topography or high myopia with thin cornea. The following parameters were evaluated before surgery and at 1 day; 1 week; and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery: corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected distance visual acuity, manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), keratometry values, and thinnest corneal thickness.
Results: After 1 month, no eye showed loss of 1 or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity. At 12 months, uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better for 98% and 99% eyes in the SMILE Xtra and FS-LASIK Xtra groups, respectively (P = 0.657). For 93.8% eyes in the SMILE Xtra group and 90% eyes in the FS-LASIK Xtra group, the achieved MRSE was within ±0.50 diopter of the intended MRSE (P = 0.669). The correlation coefficients for predictability of MRSE correction by SMILE Xtra and FS-LASIK Xtra were 0.987 and 0.983, respectively. The mean MRSE values, keratometry values, and thinnest corneal thickness measured at the different time points showed no significant intra- or intergroup differences.
Conclusions: Our evaluations of 1-year outcomes suggest that the safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability of SMILE Xtra are comparable with those of FS-LASIK Xtra.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Femto-LASIK With Combined Accelerated Cross-linking to Femto-LASIK in High Myopic Eyes: A Prospective Randomized Trial.Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;211:42-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.10.024. Epub 2019 Nov 1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 31678559 Clinical Trial.
-
Short-term Variance of Refractive Outcomes After Simultaneous LASIK and High-Fluence Cross-linking in High Myopic Correction.J Refract Surg. 2016 Oct 1;32(10):664-670. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160728-01. J Refract Surg. 2016. PMID: 27722753
-
Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia.J Refract Surg. 2014 Apr;30(4):248-54. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140320-03. J Refract Surg. 2014. PMID: 24702576
-
Review of Laser Vision Correction (LASIK, PRK and SMILE) with Simultaneous Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking - Long-term Results.Curr Eye Res. 2019 Nov;44(11):1171-1180. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1656749. Epub 2019 Aug 23. Curr Eye Res. 2019. PMID: 31411927 Review.
-
Comparing femtosecond LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 1;36(4):276-281. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001145. Epub 2025 Apr 21. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40279261 Review.
Cited by
-
Meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, stability and predictability of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for myopia.Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Feb 8;39(1):57. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04007-0. Lasers Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 38329555
-
Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes between Combined Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis and Corneal Cross Linking versus Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Corneal Cross Linking.J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 31;2022:6994355. doi: 10.1155/2022/6994355. eCollection 2022. J Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35140987 Free PMC article.
-
A prospective randomized self-controlled study of LASIK combined with accelerated cross-linking for high myopia in Chinese: 24-month follow-up.BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 24;22(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02491-y. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35751042 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Ang M, Farook M, Htoon HM, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing femtosecond LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction. Ophthalmology. 2020;127:724–730.
-
- Blum M, Täubig K, Gruhn C, et al. Five-year results of small incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:1192–1195.
-
- Yuen LH, Chan WK, Koh J, et al. A 10-year prospective audit of LASIK outcomes for myopia in 37,932 eyes at a single institution in Asia. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1236–1244.e1.
-
- Giri P, Azar DT. Risk profiles of ectasia after keratorefractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017;28:337–342.
-
- Krueger RR, Meister CS. A review of small incision lenticule extraction complications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29:292–298.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources