Global Epidemiology of Chronic Venous Disease: A Systematic Review With Pooled Prevalence Analysis
- PMID: 33214466
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004631
Global Epidemiology of Chronic Venous Disease: A Systematic Review With Pooled Prevalence Analysis
Abstract
Objective: To provide an updated estimate of the global prevalence of CVD and to comprehensively evaluate risk factors associated with this condition.
Background: CVD is an important cause of morbidity internationally, but the global burden of this condition is poorly characterized. The burden of CVD must be better characterized to optimize service provision and permit workforce planning to care for patients with different stages of CVD.
Methods: A systematic search in Ovid MEDLINE and Embase (1946-2019) identified 1271 articles. Full-text, English language articles reporting on the epidemiology of CVD in a general adult population were included. Data extraction was performed by 2 independent reviewers, in accordance with a preregistered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42019153656). STATA and Review Manager were used for quantitative analysis. A crude, unadjusted pooled prevalence was calculated for each Clinical (C) stage in the Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiologic classification and across different geographical regions. Qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate associated risk factors in CVD.
Results: Thirty-two articles across 6 continents were identified. Nineteen studies were included in the overall pooled prevalence for each Clinical (C) stage; pooled estimates were: C0 s: 9%, C1: 26%, C2: 19%, C3: 8%, C4: 4%, C5: 1%, C6: 0.42%. The prevalence of C2 disease was highest in Western Europe and lowest in the Middle East and Africa. Commonly reported risk factors for CVD included: female sex (OR 2.26, 95% confidence intervals 2.16-2.36, P < 0.001), increasing age, obesity, prolonged standing, positive family history, parity, and Caucasian ethnicity. There was significant heterogeneity across the included studies.
Conclusions: CVD affects a significant proportion of the population globally; however, there is significant heterogeneity in existing epidemiological studies.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Eklof B, Rutherford RB, Bergan JJ, et al. Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: consensus statement. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40:1248–1252.
-
- Lurie F, Passman M, Meisner M, et al. The 2020 update of the CEAP classification system and reporting standards. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020; 8:342–352.
-
- Souza Nogueira G, Rodrigues Zanin C, Miyazaki MC, et al. Venous leg ulcers and emotional consequences. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2009; 8:194–196.
-
- Sritharan K, Lane TR, Davies AH. The burden of depression in patients with symptomatic varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012; 43:480–484.
-
- The Kings Fund. The NHS budget and how it has changed. Available at: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/nhs-in-a-nutshell/nhs-budget . [Accessed 01/09/2020].
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
