Failure to Rescue in Emergency General Surgery: Impact of Fragmentation of Care
- PMID: 33214470
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004628
Failure to Rescue in Emergency General Surgery: Impact of Fragmentation of Care
Abstract
Objective: Compare EGS patient outcomes after index and nonindex hospital readmissions, and explore predictive factors for nonindex readmission.
Background: Readmission to a different hospital leads to fragmentation of care. The impact of nonindex readmission on patient outcomes after EGS is not well established.
Methods: The Nationwide Readmissions Database (2017) was queried for adult patients readmitted after an EGS procedure. Patients were stratified and propensity-matched according to readmission destination: index versus nonindex hospital. Outcomes were failure to rescue (FTR), mortality, number of subsequent readmissions, overall hospital length of stay, and total costs. Hierarchical logistic regression was performed to account for clustering effect within hospitals and adjusting for patient- and hospital-level potential confounding factors.
Results: A total of 471,570 EGS patients were identified, of which 79,127 (16.8%) were readmitted within 30 days: index hospital (61,472; 77.7%) versus nonindex hospital (17,655; 22.3%). After 1:1 propensity matching, patients with nonindex readmission had higher rates of FTR (5.6% vs 4.3%; P < 0.001), mortality (2.7% vs 2.1%; P < 0.001), and overall hospital costs [in $1000; 37 (27-64) vs 28 (21-48); P < 0.001]. Nonindex readmission was independently associated with higher odds of FTR [adjusted odds ratio 1.18 (1.03-1.36); P < 0.001]. Predictors of nonindex readmission included top quartile for zip code median household income [1.35 (1.08-1.69); P < 0.001], fringe county residence [1.08 (1.01-1.16); P = 0.049], discharge to a skilled nursing facility [1.28 (1.20-1.36); P < 0.001], and leaving against medical advice [2.32 (1.81-2.98); P < 0.001].
Conclusion: One in 5 readmissions after EGS occur at a different hospital. Nonindex readmission carries a heightened risk of FTR.
Level of evidence: Level III Prognostic.
Study type: Prognostic.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Shafi S, Aboutanos MB, Agarwal S Jr, et al. Emergency general surgery: definition and estimated burden of disease. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74:1092–1097.
-
- Havens JM, Peetz AB, Do WS, et al. The excess morbidity and mortality of emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78:306–311.
-
- Lyu HG, Najjar P, Havens JM. Past, present, and future of Emergency General Surgery in the USA. Acute Med Surg. 2018;5:119–122.
-
- Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1418–1428.
-
- Kent TS, Sachs TE, Callery MP, et al. Readmission after major pancreatic resection: a necessary evil? J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:515–523.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
