Episiotomy practices in France: epidemiology and risk factors in non-operative vaginal deliveries
- PMID: 33214621
- PMCID: PMC7677317
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70881-7
Episiotomy practices in France: epidemiology and risk factors in non-operative vaginal deliveries
Erratum in
-
Author Correction: Episiotomy practices in France: epidemiology and risk factors in non-operative vaginal deliveries.Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 19;11(1):6839. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85717-1. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33742003 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Episiotomy use has decreased due to the lack of evidence on its protective effects from maternal obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Indications for episiotomy vary considerably and there are a great variety of factors associated with its use. The aim of this article is to describe the episiotomy rate in France between 2013 and 2017 and the factors associated with its use in non-operative vaginal deliveries. In this retrospective population-based cohort study, we included vaginal deliveries performed in French hospitals (N = 584) and for which parity was coded. The variable of interest was the rate of episiotomy, particularly for non-operative vaginal deliveries. Trends in the episiotomy rates were studied using the Cochran-Armitage test. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with episiotomy according to maternal age and parity. Between 2013 and 2017, French episiotomy rates fell from 21.6 to 14.3% for all vaginal deliveries (p < 0.01), and from 15.5 to 9.3% (p < 0.01) for all non-operative vaginal deliveries. Among non-operative vaginal deliveries, epidural analgesia, non-reassuring fetal heart rate, meconium in the amniotic fluid, shoulder dystocia, and newborn weight (≥ 4,000 g) were risk factors for episiotomy, both for nulliparous and multiparous women. On the contrary, prematurity reduced the risk of its use. For nulliparous women, breech presentation was also a risk factor for episiotomy, and for multiparous women, scarred uterus and multiple pregnancies were risk factors. In France, despite a reduction in episiotomy use over the last few years, the factors associated with episiotomy have not changed and are similar to the literature. This suggests that the decrease in episiotomies in France is an overall tendency which is probably related to improved care strategies that have been relayed by hospital teams and perinatal networks.
Conflict of interest statement
Author PS received funding from the following commercial companies: Merck Serono, Finox Biotech, MSD France SAS, Teva Santé SAS, Allergan France, Gedeon Richter France, Effik S.A., Karl Storz Endoscopie France, GE Medical Systems SCS, Laboratoires Genevrier, H.A.C. Pharma, and Ipsen. Author PS confirms that none of this funding was used to support the research in this study. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
How did episiotomy rates change from 2007 to 2014? Population-based study in France.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1747-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 29866103 Free PMC article.
-
Episiotomies and obstetric anal sphincter injuries following a restrictive episiotomy policy in France: An analysis of the 2010, 2016, and 2021 National Perinatal Surveys.PLoS Med. 2025 Jan 14;22(1):e1004501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004501. eCollection 2025 Jan. PLoS Med. 2025. PMID: 39808593 Free PMC article.
-
Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study.CMAJ. 2019 Oct 21;191(42):E1149-E1158. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190366. CMAJ. 2019. PMID: 31636163 Free PMC article.
-
[What are the epidemiologic data in regard to episiotomy?].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006 Feb;35(1 Suppl):1S12-1S23. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006. PMID: 16495823 Review. French.
-
Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.06.043. Epub 2011 Jul 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011. PMID: 21802193 Review.
Cited by
-
A Systematic Review of the Use of Routine Versus Selective Episiotomy for Vaginal Birth.Cureus. 2024 Jul 31;16(7):e65865. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65865. eCollection 2024 Jul. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39219872 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effect of Camellia sinensis ointment on perineal pain and episiotomy wound healing in primiparous women: A triple-blind randomized clinical trial.PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0305048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305048. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39088486 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Early detection of perinatal depression in couples: a single-center prospective study.Eur Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 3;67(1):e48. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1755. Eur Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 39225230 Free PMC article.
-
Episiotomy Practice and Its Associated Factors in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 24;9:905174. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.905174. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35865171 Free PMC article.
-
Episiotomy for Medical Indications during Vaginal Birth-Retrospective Analysis of Risk Factors Determining the Performance of This Procedure.J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 26;11(15):4334. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154334. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35893429 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kalis V, Laine K, de Leeuw JW, Ismail KM, Tincello DG. Classification of episiotomy: Towards a standardisation of terminology. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2012;119:522–526. - PubMed
-
- Carroli G, Belizan J. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000081. - PubMed
-
- Clesse, C., Lighezzolo-Alnot, J., De Lavergne, S., Hamlin, S. & Scheffler, M. Statistical trends of episiotomy around the world: Comparative systematic review of changing practices. Health Care Women Int. 39(6), 644–662 (2018). - PubMed
-
- Clesse, C., Lighezzolo-Alnot, J., De Lavergne, S., Hamlin, S. & Scheffler, M. Socio-historical evolution of the episiotomy practice: A literature review. Women Health. 59(7), 760-774 (2018). - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources