Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;10(12):529.
doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02526-5. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

Polymorphic variants of drug-metabolizing enzymes alter the risk and survival of oral cancer patients

Affiliations

Polymorphic variants of drug-metabolizing enzymes alter the risk and survival of oral cancer patients

Sarika Daripally et al. 3 Biotech. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

The present study investigated the prevalence of CYP2D6*4, CYP3A5*3 and SULT1A1*2, using PCR-RFLP, in normal and oral cancer (OC) patients that were stratified by OC subtype and gender. The risk of cancer, 5-year cumulative survival and hazard's ratio (HR) with respect to risk factors and clinical factors were estimated using Fisher's exact test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards models. CYP2D6*4 'GA' lowered the risk of buccal mucosa cancer (BMC) in males (OR = 0.37), whereas, 'G' allele of CYP3A5*3 increased risk of tongue cancer (TC) (OR = 1.67). SULT1A1*2 'GA' increased the risk of TC (OR = 2.36) and BMC (OR = 3.25) in females. The 5-year survival of the patients depended on factors like age, lymphovascular spread (LVS), perinodal spread (PNS), recurrence, tobacco, and alcohol. CYP3A5*3 'AG' and 'GG' had decreased the hazard ratio (HR) for BMC females when inflammatory infiltrate alone or along with other covariates, LVS, PNI, PNS, metastasis, recurrence, and relapse was adjusted. Similarly, CYP3A5*3 'AG' decreased the risk of death (HR = 0.05) when the grade was adjusted. SULT1A1*2 'GA' had decreased HR for TC males (HR = 0.08) after adjusting for inflammatory infiltrate, LVS, perineural invasion (PNI), PNS, metastasis, recurrence, and relapse. Further, our bioinformatics study revealed the presence of a CpG island within the CYP2D6 and a CTCF binding site upstream of CYP2D6. Interestingly, three CpG islands and two CTCF binding sites were also identified near the SULT1A1. In conclusion, the SNPs altered risk and survival of BMC and TC differentially in a gender specified manner, that varied with clinical and risk factors.

Keywords: 5-Year cumulative survival; Buccal mucosa cancer; CYP2D6*4; CYP3A5*3; SULT1A1*2; Tongue cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in the publication.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier 5 year cumulative survival analysis of Wild type vs Mutant genotypes in oral cancer patients, stratified into tongue cancer (TC) and buccal mucosa cancer (BMC), gender, age groups of ≤ 50 years and > 50 years, tobacco chewing habit and CYP3A5*3 or SULT1A1*2. a BMC females aged ≤ 50 years and carriers of CYP3A5*3 (AA vs AG, AA vs GG); b TC females aged > 50 years and carriers of CYP3A5*3 (AA vs GG); c BMC males aged > 50 years and carriers of CYP3A5*3 (AA vs GG); d TC females who were tobacco chewers and carriers of SULT1A1*2 (GG vs GA)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier 5 year cumulative survival analysis of Wild type vs Mutant genotypes in oral cancer patients, stratified into tongue cancer (TC) and buccal mucosa cancer (BMC), gender and CYP2D6*4, CYP3A5*3 or SULT1A1*2 with clinical factors. a TC females with high inflammatory infiltrate and carriers of CYP2D6*4 (GG vs GA); b BMC females with grade 1 tumour and carriers of CYP3A5*3 (AA vs AG); c BMC males with mild inflammatory infiltrate and carriers of CYP3A5*3 (AA vs GG); d BMC females with moderate inflammatory infiltrate and carriers of CYP3A5*3 (AA vs GG); e TC females with high inflammatory infiltrate and carriers of CYP3A5*3 (AA vs GG); f TC males with PNS and carriers of SULT1A1*2 (GG vs GA)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abreu MH, Gomes M, Menezes F, Afonso N, Abreu PH, Medeiros R, et al. CYP2D6*4 polymorphism: a new marker of response to hormonotherapy in male breast cancer? Breast. 2015;24(4):481–486. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.04.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arslan S. Genetic polymorphisms of sulfotransferases (SULT1A1 and SULT1A2) in a Turkish population. Biochem Genet. 2010;48(11–12):987–994. doi: 10.1007/s10528-010-9387-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azarpira N, Ashraf MJ, Khademi B, Darai M, Hakimzadeh A, Abedi E. Study the polymorphism of CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 loci in Iranian population with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38(8):5443–5448. doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-0699-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhat GA, Shah IA, Rafiq R, Nabi S, Iqbal B, Lone MM, et al. Family history of cancer and the risk of squamous cell carcinoma of oesophagus: a case-control study in Kashmir, India. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(3):524–532. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.218. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Booth Depaz IM, Toselli F, Wilce PA, Gillam EM. Differential expression of cytochrome P450 enzymes from the CYP2C subfamily in the human brain. Drug Metab Dispos. 2013;43(3):353–357. doi: 10.1124/dmd.114.061242. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources