Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul;46(5):807-813.
doi: 10.1111/ced.14516. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

Environmentally sustainable dermatology

Affiliations
Review

Environmentally sustainable dermatology

E Allwright et al. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

In 2017, health and social care organizations contributed 6.3% of carbon emissions in England. Efforts to reduce the environmental footprint of the National Health Service (NHS) have been broadly focused on reducing demand, through prevention and patient empowerment, and modifying supply side factors by focusing on lean care systems and low carbon alternatives. This narrative review concentrates on supply side factors to identify sustainable practices with a focus on actions that could be implemented in dermatology departments. For this study, a literature review was conducted In MEDLINE in April 2020. The search terms included 'environmental sustainability' and 'climate change' with 'dermatology', 'telemedicine', 'NHS', 'surgery' and 'operating theatres'. Out of 95 results, 20 were deemed relevant to the review. Although the review showed that there is clearly growing interest in environmental sustainability, the identified literature lacked examples of comprehensive implementation and evaluation of initiatives. The literature discussed distinct areas including transport, waste management and procurement as part of a lean healthcare system. A number of papers highlighted the potential contribution of carbon-reducing actions without citing verifiable outcome data. This narrative review highlights the need for detailed environmental impact assessments of treatment options in dermatology, in tandem with economic analysis. In conclusion, we have identified a clear need for evidence-based guidance setting out implementable actions with identifiable benefits achievable within local clinical teams. This will require engagement between clinicians, patients and healthcare organizations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. NHS Sustainable Development Unit. Reducing the use of natural resources in health and social care. Public Health England; 2018. Available at: https://networks.sustainablehealthcare.org.uk/sites/default/files/resour... (accessed 9 December 2020).
    1. Kaffenberger BH, Shetlar D, Norton SA, Rosenbach M. The effect of climate change on skin disease in North America. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017; 76: 140-7.
    1. Mortimer F. The sustainable physician. Clin Med (Lond) 2010; 10: 110-11.
    1. The World Bank. Climate-smart healthcare. Low-Carbon and resilience strategies for the health sector. Available at: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/322251495434571418/pdf/113572... (accessed 9 December 2020).
    1. Wernham A, Patel A, Sharma A, Varma S. Environmental impact of Mohs surgery and measures to reduce our carbon footprint in dermatological surgery. Br J Dermatol 2019; 181(Suppl): 109 (abstract DS11).

MeSH terms