Sex and Survival After Surgery for Lung Cancer: A Swedish Nationwide Cohort
- PMID: 33217414
- PMCID: PMC8129733
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.010
Sex and Survival After Surgery for Lung Cancer: A Swedish Nationwide Cohort
Abstract
Background: Prior reports on a possible female survival advantage in both surgical and nonsurgical cohorts of patients with lung cancer are conflicting. Previously reported differences in survival after lung cancer surgery could be the result of insufficient control for disparities in risk factor profiles in men and women.
Research question: Do women who undergo pulmonary resections for lung cancer have a better prognosis than men when taking a wide range of prognostic factors into account?
Study design and methods: We performed a nationwide population-based observational cohort study analyzing sex-specific survival after pulmonary resections for lung cancer. We identified 6356 patients from the Swedish National Quality Register for General Thoracic Surgery and performed individual-level record linkage to other national health-data registers to acquire detailed information regarding comorbidity, socioeconomic status, and vital status. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for differences in baseline characteristics. The association between female sex and all-cause mortality was assessed with Cox regression models, and flexible parametric survival models were used to estimate the absolute survival differences with 95% CIs. We also estimated the difference in restricted mean survival time.
Results: We observed a lower risk of death in women compared with men (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.79). The absolute survival difference at 1, 5, and 10 years was 3.0% (95% CI, 2.2%-3.8%), 10% (95% CI, 7.0%-12%), and 12% (95% CI, 8.5%-15%), respectively. The restricted mean survival time difference at 10 years was 0.84 year (95% CI, 0.61-1.07 years). The findings were consistent across several subgroups.
Interpretation: Women who underwent pulmonary resections for lung cancer had a significantly better prognosis than men. The survival advantage was evident regardless of age, common comorbidities, socioeconomic status, lifestyle factors, physical performance, type and extent of surgery, tumor characteristics, and stage of disease.
Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03567538; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Keywords: epidemiology (pulmonary); lung cancer; sex; thoracic surgery.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Increased Risk and Improved Survival: The Double-Edged Sword of Lung Cancer in Women.Chest. 2021 May;159(5):1719-1720. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.12.046. Chest. 2021. PMID: 33965130 No abstract available.
-
Women Fare Better After Lung-Cancer Surgery: What Does This Mean for Clinical Practice?Chest. 2021 May;159(5):2119-2120. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.12.060. Chest. 2021. PMID: 33965146 No abstract available.
-
Response.Chest. 2021 May;159(5):2120-2121. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.044. Chest. 2021. PMID: 33965147 No abstract available.
References
-
- Afshar N., English D.R., Thursfield V. Differences in cancer survival by sex: a population-based study using cancer registry data. Cancer Causes Control. 2018 ;29(11):1059-1069. - PubMed
-
- Micheli A., Ciampichini R., Oberaigner W. The advantage of women in cancer survival: an analysis of EUROCARE-4 data. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(6):1017–1027. - PubMed
-
- Radkiewicz C., Johansson A.L.V., Dickman P.W., Lambe M., Edgren G. Sex differences in cancer risk and survival: a Swedish cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2017;84:130–140. - PubMed
-
- Edgren G., Liang L., Adami H.O., Chang E.T. Enigmatic sex disparities in cancer incidence. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27(3):187–196. - PubMed
-
- Wakelee H.A., Wang W., Schiller J.H. Survival differences by sex for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial 1594. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1(5):441–446. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
