Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 20;99(47):e23126.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023126.

Effect of home-based high-intensity interval training using telerehabilitation among coronary heart disease patients

Affiliations

Effect of home-based high-intensity interval training using telerehabilitation among coronary heart disease patients

Filip Dosbaba et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases are the world's most common causes of morbidity and mortality in the population, including Central Europe. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an effective preventive approach that includes several core components. Physical training is identified as an integral and essential part of CR. Training can positively influence several cardiovascular risk factors in people diagnosed with coronary heart disease and prevent them from clinical events. Our study aims to research the method of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in a home environment using telerehabilitation. We assume that the HIIT form of telerehabilitation, using a heart rate monitor as a tool for backing up training data, can improve cardiorespiratory fitness and lead to higher peak oxygen uptake than the traditional moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT).

Methods: This study is designed as a monocentral randomized controlled trial at University Hospital Brno in the Czech Republic. After the coronary heart event, the suitable patients will be randomized (1:1 ratio) and separated into 2 groups: the experimental HIIT group and the control MICT group. Both groups undergo a 12-week telerehabilitation with a 1-year follow-up period. Study participants will be telemonitored during physical training in their home environment via a heart rate monitor and a web platform. Once a week, the patients will give their feedback and motivation by a telephone call.The primary outcome observed will be the effect of intervention expressed by changes in cardiorespiratory fitness. Secondary outcomes will be the health-related quality of life, anxiety, training adherence, body composition, safety, and satisfaction.

Discussion: The HIIT is widely researched predominantly in a center-based supervised form. Our study differs from others by the use of telemedicine and smart technologies in home-based settings. Previous home-based cardiac telerehabilitation studies have focused primarily on MICT, which has demonstrated feasibility, and results have shown similar improvements as center-based CR. There is a presumption that HIIT may be superior to MICT. However, it can be complicated to self-dose the method in the home environment. Investigators expect that HIIT research will provide insight into the possibilities of telemedicine feasibility, effect, and limitations of coronary heart disease patients' use at low to moderate cardiovascular risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study protocol.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Home-based telerehabilitation scheme. The figure represents home-based physical training via telemonitoring and remote guidance. Icons illustrate cardiac telerehabilitation form. The differences in training prescription between the two study groups are shown in the diagram at the top left.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2015. Global health indicators Part II. World Health Organization, 2015. Available at: http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/EN_WHS2015_P.... Accessed September 1, 2020.
    1. Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, et al. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011;123:933–44. - PubMed
    1. Sandesara PB, Lambert CT, Gordon NF, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and risk reduction: time to “rebrand and reinvigorate”. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:389–95. - PubMed
    1. American Association of Cardiovascular & Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for cardia rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs. Human Kinet 2013;336.
    1. Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson DR, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:1–2. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms