Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 18;12(11):3419.
doi: 10.3390/cancers12113419.

Assessing Effectiveness of Colonic and Gynecological Risk Reducing Surgery in Lynch Syndrome Individuals

Affiliations

Assessing Effectiveness of Colonic and Gynecological Risk Reducing Surgery in Lynch Syndrome Individuals

Nuria Dueñas et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Colorectal (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) are the most common types of cancer in Lynch syndrome (LS). Risk reducing surgeries (RRS) might impact cancer incidence and mortality. Our objectives were to evaluate cumulative incidences of CRC, gynecological cancer and all-cause mortality after RRS in LS individuals.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 976 LS carriers from a single-institution registry. Primary endpoints were cumulative incidence at 75 years of cancer (metachronous CRC in 425 individuals; EC and ovarian cancer (OC) in 531 individuals) and all-cause mortality cumulative incidence, comparing extended (ES) vs. segmental surgery (SS) in the CRC cohort and risk reducing gynecological surgery (RRGS) vs. surveillance in the gynecological cohort.

Results: Cumulative incidence at 75 years of metachronous CRC was 12.5% vs. 44.7% (p = 0.04) and all-cause mortality cumulative incidence was 38.6% vs. 55.3% (p = 0.31), for ES and SS, respectively. Cumulative, incidence at 75 years was 11.2% vs. 46.3% for EC (p = 0.001) and 0% vs. 12.7% for OC (p N/A) and all-cause mortality cumulative incidence was 0% vs. 52.7% (p N/A), for RRGS vs. surveillance, respectively.

Conclusions: RRS in LS reduces the incidence of metachronous CRC and gynecological neoplasms, also indicating a reduction in all-cause mortality cumulative incidence in females undergoing RRGS.

Keywords: Lynch syndrome; colorectal neoplasms; endometrial neoplasms; gynecological neoplasms; ovarian neoplasms; prophylactic surgical procedures; risk reducing surgery; risk reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Colorectal cancer cohort: (A) Cumulative incidence at 75 years of metachronous colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome subjects comparing extended surgery and segmental surgery: Cumulative incidence at 75 years of metachronous colorectal cancer was 12.5% for extended surgery vs. 37.3% for segmental surgery (p = 0.004); (B) All-cause mortality cumulative incidence in Lynch syndrome subjects comparing extended surgery and segmental surgery: All-cause mortality cumulative incidence was 38.6% for extended surgery vs. 55.3% for segmental surgery (p = 0.31).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative incidence at 75 years of gynecological cancer in females with Lynch syndrome comparing risk reducing gynecological surgery and non-risk reducing gynecological surgery: (A) Cumulative incidence at 75 years of endometrial cancer. Cumulative incidence at 75 years of endometrial cancer was 11.2% for risk reducing gynecological surgery vs. 46.3% for non-risk reducing gynecological surgery (p = 0.001); (B) Cumulative incidence at 75 years of ovarian cancer. Cumulative incidence at 75 years of ovarian cancer was 0.0% for risk reducing gynecological surgery vs. 12.7% for non-risk reducing gynecological surgery (p = not assessable).
Figure 3
Figure 3
All-cause mortality cumulative incidence in females with Lynch syndrome comparing risk reducing gynecological surgery and non-risk reducing gynecological surgery: All-cause mortality cumulative incidence was 0.0% for 52.7% for risk reducing gynecological surgery vs. 52.7% for non-risk reducing gynecological surgery (p = not assessable).

References

    1. Moreira L., Balaguer F., Lindor N., De La Chapelle A., Hampel H., Aaltonen L.A., Hopper J.L., Le Marchand L., Gallinger S., Newcomb P.A., et al. Identification of Lynch Syndrome Among Patients with Colorectal Cancer. JAMA. 2012;308:1555–1565. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.13088. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dominguez-Valentin M., Sampson J.R., Seppälä T.T., Broeke S.W.T., Be J.-P.P., Nakken S., Engel C., Aretz S., Jenkins M.A., Sunde L., et al. Correction: Cancer risks by gene, age, and gender in 6350 carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair variants: Findings from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Genet. Med. 2020;22:15–25. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0596-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. ten Broeke S.W., Van Der Klift H.M., Tops C.M., Aretz S., Bernstein I., Buchanan D.D., De La Chapelle A., Capella G., Clendenning M., Engel C., et al. Cancer Risks for PMS2-Associated Lynch Syndrome. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018;36:2961–2968. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.4777. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Møller P., Seppälä T., Bernstein I., Holinski-Feder E., Sala P., Evans D.G., Lindblom A., Macrae F., Blanco I., Sijmons R., et al. Incidence of and survival after subsequent cancers in carriers of pathogenic MMR variants with previous cancer: A report from the prospective Lynch syndrome database. Gut. 2017;66:1657–1664. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311403. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vasen H., Abdirahman M., Brohet R., Langers A.M.J., Kleibeuker J.H., Van Kouwen M., Koornstra J.J., Boot H., Cats A., Dekker E., et al. One to 2-Year Surveillance Intervals Reduce Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Families with Lynch Syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2300–2306. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.02.053. - DOI - PubMed