Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults
- PMID: 3321809
Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults
Abstract
Clinical data from 259 patients with suspected acute appendicitis were prospectively collected and used in construction of a Bayesian scoring system, comprising 19 attributes, for preoperative diagnosis. The scoring system was integrated into the routine clinical management of a prospective series of 830 patients. Laparotomy was performed in 310 cases, and of these 256 had acute appendicitis (perforation in 14%). Excluding 6 cases with normal appendix but laparotomy mandatory for other reasons, the negative laparotomy rate was 15.5%. This rate was significantly lower than in earlier series from the same hospital and in more than 8,000 appendectomies performed in Sweden since 1969. The scoring system had 90.2% sensitivity, 91.4% specificity, 82.5% positive predictive value and 95.4% negative predictive value. The system is regarded only as an aid in diagnosis, to be used in combination with clinicians' judgements. Construction of a local data base probably is essential for results equivalent to those here reported.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic decision support in suspected acute appendicitis: validation of a simplified scoring system.Eur J Surg. 1997 Nov;163(11):831-8. Eur J Surg. 1997. PMID: 9414043
-
[Can diagnostic scoring systems help decision making in primary care of patients with suspected acute appendicitis?].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1999 May 7;124(18):545-50. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024357. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1999. PMID: 10356580 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Scoring system for computer-aided diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The value of prospective versus retrospective studies.Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1985;74(4):159-66. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1985. PMID: 3909908
-
Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Abdominal Pain Study Group.Eur J Surg. 1995 Apr;161(4):273-81. Eur J Surg. 1995. PMID: 7612771 Review.
-
[Perforation rate and diagnostic accuracy in acute appendicitis].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1994 Feb 12;138(7):350-4. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1994. PMID: 8121524 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Field trials of medical decision-aids: potential problems and solutions.Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991:3-7. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991. PMID: 1807610 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A simple scoring system to reduce the negative appendicectomy rate.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 Jul;74(4):281-5. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992. PMID: 1416684 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults with suspected appendicitis.Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):73-86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11440. Epub 2019 Dec 3. Br J Surg. 2020. PMID: 31797357 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Survey of efficacy of pediatric appendicitis score in Iranian patients less than 18 years old referred to the emergency department.J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Nov 15;8(11):3700-3705. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_740_19. eCollection 2019 Nov. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019. PMID: 31803676 Free PMC article.
-
A diagnostic score for children with suspected appendicitis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005 Apr;390(2):164-70. doi: 10.1007/s00423-005-0545-8. Epub 2005 Feb 19. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005. PMID: 15723233
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical