Assessment of Native Human Articular Cartilage: A Biomechanical Protocol
- PMID: 33218275
- PMCID: PMC8804788
- DOI: 10.1177/1947603520973240
Assessment of Native Human Articular Cartilage: A Biomechanical Protocol
Abstract
Objectives: Recapitulating the mechanical properties of articular cartilage (AC) is vital to facilitate the clinical translation of cartilage tissue engineering. Prior to evaluation of tissue-engineered constructs, it is fundamental to investigate the biomechanical properties of native AC under sudden, prolonged, and cyclic loads in a practical manner. However, previous studies have typically reported only the response of native AC to one or other of these loading regimes. We therefore developed a streamlined testing protocol to characterize the elastic and viscoelastic properties of human knee AC, generating values for several important parameters from the same sample.
Design: Human AC was harvested from macroscopically normal regions of distal femoral condyles of patients (n = 3) undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Indentation and unconfined compression tests were conducted under physiological conditions (temperature 37 °C and pH 7.4) and testing parameters (strain rates and loading frequency) to assess elastic and viscoelastic parameters.
Results: The biomechanical properties obtained were as follows: Poisson ratio (0.4 ± 0.1), instantaneous modulus (52.14 ± 9.47 MPa) at a loading rate of 1 mm/s, Young's modulus (1.03 ± 0.48 MPa), equilibrium modulus (7.48 ± 4.42 MPa), compressive modulus (10.60 ± 3.62 MPa), dynamic modulus (7.71 ± 4.62 MPa) at 1 Hz and loss factor (0.11 ± 0.02).
Conclusions: The measurements fell within the range of reported values for human knee AC biomechanics. To the authors' knowledge this study is the first to report such a range of biomechanical properties for human distal femoral AC. This protocol may facilitate the assessment of tissue-engineered composites for their functionality and biomechanical similarity to native AC prior to clinical trials.
Keywords: articular cartilage; biomechanics; knee; mechanical testing.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Boschetti F, Peretti GM. Tensile and compressive properties of healthy and osteoarthritic human articular cartilage. Biorheology. 2008;45(3-4):337-44. - PubMed
-
- Vahdati A, Wagner DR. Finite element study of a tissue-engineered cartilage transplant in human tibiofemoral joint. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2012;15(11):1211-21. - PubMed
-
- Zhang Y, Liu S, Guo W, Wang M, Hao C, Gao S, et al.. Human umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells combined with an acellular cartilage extracellular matrix scaffold improve cartilage repair compared with microfracture in a caprine model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018;26(7):954-65. - PubMed
-
- Hunziker EB. Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002;10(6):432-63. - PubMed
-
- Babalola OM, Bonassar LJ. Parametric finite element analysis of physical stimuli resulting from mechanical stimulation of tissue engineered cartilage. J Biomech Eng. 2009;131(6):061014. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
