Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 20;16(1):113.
doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00642-8.

Economic arguments in migrant health policymaking: proposing a research agenda

Affiliations

Economic arguments in migrant health policymaking: proposing a research agenda

Nora Gottlieb et al. Global Health. .

Abstract

Welfare states around the world restrict access to public healthcare for some migrant groups. Formal restrictions on migrants' healthcare access are often justified with economic arguments; for example, as a means to prevent excess costs and safeguard scarce resources. However, existing studies on the economics of migrant health policies suggest that restrictive policies increase rather than decrease costs. This evidence has largely been ignored in migration debates. Amplifying the relationship between welfare state transformations and the production of inequalities, the Covid-19 pandemic may fuel exclusionary rhetoric and politics; or it may serve as an impetus to reconsider the costs that one group's exclusion from health can entail for all members of society.The public health community has a responsibility to promote evidence-informed health policies that are ethically and economically sound, and to counter anti-migrant and racial discrimination (whether overt or masked with economic reasoning). Toward this end, we propose a research agenda which includes 1) the generation of a comprehensive body of evidence on economic aspects of migrant health policies, 2) the clarification of the role of economic arguments in migration debates, 3) (self-)critical reflection on the ethics and politics of the production of economic evidence, 4) the introduction of evidence into migrant health policymaking processes, and 5) the endorsement of inter- and transdisciplinary approaches. With the Covid-19 pandemic and surrounding events rendering the suggested research agenda more topical than ever, we invite individuals and groups to join forces toward a (self-)critical examination of economic arguments in migration and health, and in public health generally.

Keywords: Discourse analysis; Economics; Equity; Health economics; Health policy; Health political science; Migrant health; Political decision-making; Political economy; Translational research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Hannigan A, O’Donnell P, O’Keeffe M, MacFarlane A. How do variations in definitions of “migrant” and their application influence the access of migrants to health care services? Health evidence network (HEN) synthesis report 46. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2016. - PubMed
    1. Schumacher G, van Kersbergen K. Do mainstream parties adapt to the welfare chauvinism of populist parties? Party Polit. 2016;22(3):300–312. doi: 10.1177/1354068814549345. - DOI
    1. Van Oorschot W. Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. J Eur Soc Policy. 2006;16:23–42. doi: 10.1177/0958928706059829. - DOI
    1. Bansak K, Hainmueller J, Hangartner D. How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers. Science. 2016;354:217–222. doi: 10.1126/science.aag2147. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bozorgmehr K, Razum O. Effect of restricting access to health care on health expenditures among asylum-seekers and refugees: a quasi-experimental study in Germany, 1994–2013. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131483. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types