Effect of Inlays, Onlays and Endocrown Cavity Design Preparation on Fracture Resistance and Fracture Mode of Endodontically Treated Teeth: An In Vitro Study
- PMID: 33219727
- DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13294
Effect of Inlays, Onlays and Endocrown Cavity Design Preparation on Fracture Resistance and Fracture Mode of Endodontically Treated Teeth: An In Vitro Study
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the fracture resistance and failure modes of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored with different designs of inlays, onlays and endocrowns.
Materials and methods: Extracted mandibular third molars (n = 180) were used. An access cavity was prepared on the occlusal surface of each tooth and the roots were obturated with gutta percha. All specimens were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 30/group) according to the cavity design and the restoration material used. C: control group without access cavity preparation. IE: MOD inlay preparation with EverX Posterior (GC Europe) in the pulp chamber. IG: MOD inlay preparation with G-aenial Universal Flo (GC America) in the pulp chamber. OE: onlay preparation with EverX Posterior (GC Europe) in the pulp chamber. OG: onlay preparation with G-aenial Universal Flo (GC America) in the pulp chamber. EC: endocrown with an empty pulp chamber. All restorations were fabricated with CAD/CAM system using CERASMART® (GC Dental products Europe, Belgium) CAD/CAM blocks. Specimens were thermal-cycled and were subjected to a compressive load applied at 30° angle relative to the long axis of the tooth with a universal testing machine. Results were statistically analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc tests. Chi-square test and Fisher Exact tests were used for the comparisons among groups.
Results: The mean fracture strength was significantly different between the groups (p < 0.001); it was significantly highest for intact teeth, followed by endocrowns (p = 0.021). The strength was significantly lower for inlays (with G-aenial Universal Flo and EverX Posterior), intermediate for onlays with EverX Posterior followed by onlays with G-aenial Universal Flo.
Conclusions: Endocrowns exhibited higher fracture resistance than other tested composite resin groups. Endocrowns and onlays showed a more favorable failure mode than inlay restorations.
Keywords: CAD/CAM; Endodontically treated teeth; endocrowns; failure mode; nanoceramic, inlays; onlays; resistance to fracture.
© 2020 by the American College of Prosthodontists.
References
-
- Basaran ET, Gokce Y: Evaluation of the influence of various restoration techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with different cavity wall thicknesses. Niger J Clin Pract 2019;22:328-334
-
- Harsha MS, Praffulla M, Babu MR, et al: The effect of cavity design on fracture resistance and failure pattern in monolithic zirconia partial coverage restorations-an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:ZC45-ZC48
-
- Soares CJ, Rodrigues MP, Faria-E-Silva AL, et al: How biomechanics can affect the endodontic treated teeth and their restorative procedures? Braz Oral Res 2018;32(suppl 1):e76
-
- Plotino G, Grande NM, Isufi A, et al: Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with different access cavity designs. J Endod 2017;43:995-1000
-
- Salamoni Sinhori B, Vieira LCC, Baratieri LN. Influence of preparation reconstruction on the compressive strength of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. Int J Biomater 2019;2019(8):1-9, http://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7307649. eCollection 2019
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous