Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Feb;303(2):321-328.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05877-9. Epub 2020 Nov 21.

Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yuan Zhang et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is one of the serious complications associated with cesarean delivery (CD). This meta-analysis aims to identify risk factors associated with massive hemorrhage during the CSP treatment.

Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched for case-control studies published before December 31th, 2018, which compared the possible factors causing massive bleeding during the CSP treatment. Quantitative synthesis was performed by RevMan 5.3. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were performed by Stata 12.0.

Results: Total 20 case - control studies including 3101 CSP patients with previous CD met the inclusion criteria. Bleeding group had 573 patients and the control group had 2528 patients. The risk factors for massive bleeding during CSP treatment included multiple gravidities (MD = 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.28, P = 0.73), big maximum diameter of gestation sac (MD = 18.49 mm, 95%CI 15.34-21.65, P < 0.01), high gestational days (MD = 8.98 days, 95% CI 4.12-13.84, P < 0.01), high β-HCG level (MD = 21.39 IU/ml, 95% CI 7.36-35.41, P = 0.03; MD = 3.02 U/ml, 95% CI 0.21-5.84, P < 0.01) and rich blood flow around the lesion (OR = 6.73, 95% CI 3.93-11.51, P = 0.59). While, thick myometrium (MD = - 4.94 mm, 95% CI - 6.12 to - 3.75, P < 0.01) may be protective factor.

Conclusions: Multiple gravidities, big gestation sac, large gestational days, high serum β-HCG level, abundant blood supply to pregnancy sac and thin myometrium maybe the risk factors for massive bleeding during the CSP treatment.

Keywords: Cesarean scar pregnancy; Massive hemorrhage; Meta-analysis; Risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cali G, Timor-Tritsch IE, Palacios-Jaraquemada J et al (2018) Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obs Gynecol 51:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17568 - DOI
    1. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A (2012) Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review Am J Obs Gynecol 207:14–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.007 - DOI
    1. Larsen JV, Solomon MH (1978) Pregnancy in a uterine scar sacculus–an unusual cause of postabortal haemorrhage. A case report. S Afr Med J 53:142–143 - PubMed
    1. Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B et al (2003) First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obs Gynecol 21:220–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.56 - DOI
    1. Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH et al (2004) Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obs Gynecol 23:247–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.974 - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances