Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 33219842
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05877-9
Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Purpose: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is one of the serious complications associated with cesarean delivery (CD). This meta-analysis aims to identify risk factors associated with massive hemorrhage during the CSP treatment.
Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched for case-control studies published before December 31th, 2018, which compared the possible factors causing massive bleeding during the CSP treatment. Quantitative synthesis was performed by RevMan 5.3. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were performed by Stata 12.0.
Results: Total 20 case - control studies including 3101 CSP patients with previous CD met the inclusion criteria. Bleeding group had 573 patients and the control group had 2528 patients. The risk factors for massive bleeding during CSP treatment included multiple gravidities (MD = 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.28, P = 0.73), big maximum diameter of gestation sac (MD = 18.49 mm, 95%CI 15.34-21.65, P < 0.01), high gestational days (MD = 8.98 days, 95% CI 4.12-13.84, P < 0.01), high β-HCG level (MD = 21.39 IU/ml, 95% CI 7.36-35.41, P = 0.03; MD = 3.02 U/ml, 95% CI 0.21-5.84, P < 0.01) and rich blood flow around the lesion (OR = 6.73, 95% CI 3.93-11.51, P = 0.59). While, thick myometrium (MD = - 4.94 mm, 95% CI - 6.12 to - 3.75, P < 0.01) may be protective factor.
Conclusions: Multiple gravidities, big gestation sac, large gestational days, high serum β-HCG level, abundant blood supply to pregnancy sac and thin myometrium maybe the risk factors for massive bleeding during the CSP treatment.
Keywords: Cesarean scar pregnancy; Massive hemorrhage; Meta-analysis; Risk factors.
Similar articles
-
[Management of cesarean scar pregnancy by hysteroscopy combined with uterine artery embolism].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Aug;46(8):591-4. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011. PMID: 22169517 Chinese.
-
Risk factors for intra-operative haemorrhage and bleeding risk scoring system for caesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Dec;195:141-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.023. Epub 2015 Jul 8. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015. PMID: 26544025
-
Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Using Ultrasound-Guided Dilation and Curettage.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):707-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 20. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26803916
-
Primary evacuation therapy for Cesarean scar pregnancy: three new cases and review.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;27(2):222-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.2644. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16323153 Review.
-
Outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy according to gestational age at diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Mar;258:53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.036. Epub 2020 Nov 12. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021. PMID: 33421811
Cited by
-
Comparison of clinical safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection versus uterine artery embolization in the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 7;23(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05455-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 36882695 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of intraoperative hemorrhage during cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy surgery: development and validation of an interpretable machine learning prediction model.EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Nov 29;78:102969. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102969. eCollection 2024 Dec. EClinicalMedicine. 2024. PMID: 39687425 Free PMC article.
-
Local Methotrexate Injection Followed by Dilation and Curettage for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Prospective Non-randomized Study.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 21;8:800610. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.800610. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35127758 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Application of a New Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Classification and Evaluation System and a Risk Scoring System.Int J Gen Med. 2024 Jan 16;17:115-126. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S445327. eCollection 2024. Int J Gen Med. 2024. PMID: 38249619 Free PMC article.
-
A study on the timing of uterine artery embolization followed by pregnancy excision for cesarean scar pregnancy: a prospective study in China.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Oct 15;21(1):697. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04180-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 34654394 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cali G, Timor-Tritsch IE, Palacios-Jaraquemada J et al (2018) Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obs Gynecol 51:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17568 - DOI
-
- Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A (2012) Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review Am J Obs Gynecol 207:14–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.007 - DOI
-
- Larsen JV, Solomon MH (1978) Pregnancy in a uterine scar sacculus–an unusual cause of postabortal haemorrhage. A case report. S Afr Med J 53:142–143 - PubMed
-
- Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B et al (2003) First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obs Gynecol 21:220–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.56 - DOI
-
- Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH et al (2004) Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obs Gynecol 23:247–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.974 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous