Associations Between LGBTQ-Affirming School Climate and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Among Adolescents
- PMID: 33219902
- PMCID: PMC7959187
- DOI: 10.1007/s11121-020-01192-6
Associations Between LGBTQ-Affirming School Climate and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Among Adolescents
Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) impacts sexual minority adolescents at rates equal to or greater than the rate it impacts heterosexual adolescents. We investigated whether reports of physical and sexual IPV were less frequent in school jurisdictions with more affirming climates for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) students; and whether these associations varied for sexual orientation subgroups. We combined student-level data from the 2015 Youth Risk Behavior Surveys on demographics and experiences with physical and sexual IPV with jurisdiction-level data from the 2014 School Health Profiles on LGBTQ-affirming school climate. Multilevel logistic regression models examined associations between LGBTQ-affirming school climates and IPV. We stratified our data by sex and examined whether these associations differed by sexual orientation subgroups using cross-level interaction terms between school climate and sexual orientation (assessed via sexual identity and behavior). Sexual minority youth were more likely to report experiencing past-year physical and sexual IPV than their heterosexual counterparts. Attending schools with more LGBTQ-affirming climates reduced the likelihood of reporting physical IPV, but not sexual IPV, for female students. More LGBTQ-affirming school climates increased risk for sexual IPV among gay male students. Establishing LGBTQ-affirming school climates may reduce physical IPV for female students, but may have unintended consequences on sexual IPV prevalence for gay male students. More work is necessary to ensure that these climates are affirming for all sexual minority students and to address sexual violence prevention.
Keywords: Adolescence; Dating violence; Intimate partner violence; School climate; Sexual minority youth.
Conflict of interest statement
B. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Declarations
The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health supported this research article. The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest. Northwestern University granted the study exempt status.
References
-
- Adams AE, Greeson MR, Kennedy AC, & Tolman RM (2013). The effects of adolescent intimate partner violence on women’s educational attainment and earnings. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28 (17), 3283–3300. - PubMed
-
- Banyard VL, & Cross C (2008). Consequences of teen dating violence: Understanding intervening variables in ecological context. Violence Against Women, 14 (9), 998–1013. - PubMed
-
- Black WW, Fedewa AL, & Gonzalez KA (2012). Effects of “Safe School” programs and policies on the social climate for sexual-minority youth: A review of the literature. Journal of LGBT Youth, 9 (4), 321–339.
-
- Brener ND, Kann L, Shanklin S, Kinchen S, Eaton DK, Hawkins J, & Flint KH (2013). Methodology of the youth risk behavior surveillance system—2013. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Recommendations and Reports, 62 (1), 1–20. - PubMed
-
- Carvalho AF, Lewis RJ, Derlega VJ, Winstead BA, & Viggiano C (2011). Internalized sexual minority stressors and same-sex intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 26 (7), 501–509. doi:10.1007/s10896-011-9384-2 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
