Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov-Dec:38:101920.
doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101920. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

Saliva as a possible tool for the SARS-CoV-2 detection: A review

Affiliations
Review

Saliva as a possible tool for the SARS-CoV-2 detection: A review

Régia Carla Medeiros da Silva et al. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Salivary tests for the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) diagnosis have been suggested as alternative methods for the nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal tests.

Method: Two reviewers independently performed a search in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus to identify cross-sectional and cohort studies that used saliva samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection. The search strategy was: ("saliva") and ("SARS-CoV-2" or "coronavirus" or "COVID-1").

Results: A total of 363 studies were identified and 39 were selected for review. Salivary samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection was as consistent and sensitive as the nasopharyngeal swabs in most studies, having been effective in detecting asymptomatic infections previously tested negative in nasopharyngeal samples. Viral nucleic acids found in saliva obtained from the duct of the salivary gland may indicate infection in that gland. Live viruses could be detected in saliva by viral culture.

Conclusions: Salivary samples show great potential in SARS-CoV-2 detection and may be recommended as a simple and non-invasive alternative.

Keywords: Coronavirus infections; Review; Saliva.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. A.1
Fig. A.1
Article selection flowchart. Nine hundred and sixty five studies identified through electronic search and 4 through manual search, totaling 363 articles after duplicates removed, published between January and October 2020 were evaluated. After reading the titles and abstracts, 291 articles were excluded. Of the 72 articles selected for reading in full text, 29 were excluded. Forty three were fully evaluated, four being excluded when the inclusion / exclusion criteria were applied, totaling thirty nine articles included for the current review .

References

    1. Wang C., Horby P.W., Hayden F.G., Gao G.F. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020;395:470–473. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736-(20)-30185-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/
    1. Xu R., Cui B., Duan X., Zhang P., Zhou X., Yuan Q. Saliva: potential diagnostic value and transmission of 2019-nCoV. Int J Oral Sci. 2020;12:11. doi: 10.1038/s41368-020-0080-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharma S, Kumar V, Chawla A, Logani A. Rapid detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 in saliva: can an endodontist take the lead in point‐of‐care COVID‐19 testing? Int Endod J. 10.1111/iej.13317. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sullivan P.S., Sailey C., Guest J.L. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and antibodies in diverse samples: protocol to validate the sufficiency of provider-observed, home-collected blood, saliva, and oropharyngeal samples. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 2020 Apr-Jun;6(2) doi: 10.2196/19054. - DOI - PMC - PubMed