Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar
- PMID: 33222177
- PMCID: PMC8246929
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13493
Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar
Abstract
Objective: To perform a retrospective external validation of miniPIERS in Zanzibar's referral hospital.
Methods: From February to December 2017, data were collected retrospectively on all cases of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) admitted to Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar, Tanzania. The primary outcome was the predictive performance of miniPIERS by examining measures of discrimination, calibration, and stratification accuracy. The secondary outcome was the applicability of miniPIERS within the referral hospital setting.
Results: During this period, 2218 of 13 395 (21%) patients were identified with HDP, of whom 594 met the inclusion criteria. Sixty per cent of patients with adverse outcomes were excluded because they had experienced one of the adverse outcomes before admission. The discriminative ability of miniPIERS was inaccurate. It was not likely to aid risk stratification because of low sensitivity and low positive predictive value. The model showed fair discrimination in HDP before 34 weeks of gestation (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.82).
Conclusions: The benefit of miniPIERS appeared to be limited, although clinical conditions make any validation challenging. Its application for risk stratification in preterm pregnancies should be further investigated.
Keywords: HELLP; Tanzania; eclampsia; hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; miniPIERS; pre-eclampsia.
© 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Conflict of interest statement
The lead author affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned have been explained. We have followed EQUATOR reporting guidelines of the TRIPOD protocol (Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis).
Figures
References
-
- Ukah UV, De Silva DA, Payne B, et al. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes from pre‐eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;11:115‐123. - PubMed
-
- Duley L. The global impact of pre‐eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33(3):130‐137. - PubMed
-
- Hutcheon JA, Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Epidemiology of pre‐eclampsia and the other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;25(4):391‐403. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous