Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;153(2):300-306.
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13493. Epub 2020 Dec 22.

Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar

Affiliations

Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar

Elleke van der Meij et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 May.

Abstract

Objective: To perform a retrospective external validation of miniPIERS in Zanzibar's referral hospital.

Methods: From February to December 2017, data were collected retrospectively on all cases of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) admitted to Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar, Tanzania. The primary outcome was the predictive performance of miniPIERS by examining measures of discrimination, calibration, and stratification accuracy. The secondary outcome was the applicability of miniPIERS within the referral hospital setting.

Results: During this period, 2218 of 13 395 (21%) patients were identified with HDP, of whom 594 met the inclusion criteria. Sixty per cent of patients with adverse outcomes were excluded because they had experienced one of the adverse outcomes before admission. The discriminative ability of miniPIERS was inaccurate. It was not likely to aid risk stratification because of low sensitivity and low positive predictive value. The model showed fair discrimination in HDP before 34 weeks of gestation (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.82).

Conclusions: The benefit of miniPIERS appeared to be limited, although clinical conditions make any validation challenging. Its application for risk stratification in preterm pregnancies should be further investigated.

Keywords: HELLP; Tanzania; eclampsia; hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; miniPIERS; pre-eclampsia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The lead author affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned have been explained. We have followed EQUATOR reporting guidelines of the TRIPOD protocol (Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis).

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow‐chart miniPIERS Zanzibar part 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Flow‐chart miniPIERS Zanzibar part 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Receiver operating characteristics curves miniPIERS Zanzibar
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Calibration plot Zanzibar cohort A

References

    1. Ukah UV, De Silva DA, Payne B, et al. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes from pre‐eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;11:115‐123. - PubMed
    1. Duley L. The global impact of pre‐eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33(3):130‐137. - PubMed
    1. Hutcheon JA, Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Epidemiology of pre‐eclampsia and the other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;25(4):391‐403. - PubMed
    1. Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi‐Villa A, Coggeshall MS, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:980‐1004. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nakimuli A, Nakubulwa S, Kakaire O, et al. The burden of maternal morbidity and mortality attributable to hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a prospective cohort study from Uganda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;4(16):205. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types