Long-term crestal bone changes in implants placed in augmented sinuses with minimal or moderate remaining alveolar bone: A 10-year retrospective case-series study
- PMID: 33222302
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.13680
Long-term crestal bone changes in implants placed in augmented sinuses with minimal or moderate remaining alveolar bone: A 10-year retrospective case-series study
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of dental implants placed after lateral window sinus augmentation utilizing the sagittal sandwich technique.
Materials and methods: Patients treated with sinus augmentation were included in this retrospective case-series study. The surgical procedure was performed with particulate autogenous bone- and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral (3:7 ratio). Implants were grouped based on baseline residual alveolar ridge height: group S (residual alveolar ridge height of 0.1-3.5 mm), group M (height of 3.5-7mm), and group C (native bone). Radiographs were taken at baseline (abutment installation) and annually throughout the 10-year follow-up.
Results: A total of 86 patients (92 sinus lifts) and 209 implants were included. Ten sinus membrane perforations were recorded (11% incidence), and graft infections occurred in 3 cases (3.2% incidence). During the 10-year follow-up, 3 implants (1.4%) failed. No significant differences in the mean implant marginal bone loss (MBL) between the three groups were found after 1-, 2-, and 5-year follow-up (p > .05). At 10 years, group C exhibited more MBL than group M with a mean difference of -0.53 mm (p = .01). After 10 years, MK III implants displayed significantly more bone loss in native bone than those in augmented bone with a mean difference of 0.48 mm (p = .02). Five patients and 7 implants developed peri-implantitis with no significant differences between the groups (p = .570).
Conclusion: Implant placement after two-stage sinus grafting utilizing the sagittal sandwich technique is a relatively safe and predictable procedure with minimal complications and MBL after 10-year follow-up.
Keywords: clinical trial; dental implants; posterior maxilla; sinus grafting; staged procedure.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abi Najm, S., Malis, D., El Hage, M., Rahban, S., Carrel, J. P., & Bernard, J. P. (2013). Potential adverse events of endosseous dental implants penetrating the maxillary sinus: Long-term clinical evaluation. Laryngoscope, 123(12), 2958-2961. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24189
-
- Aghaloo, T. L., Misch, C., Lin, G. H., Iacono, V. J., & Wang, H. L. (2016). Bone augmentation of the edentulous maxilla for implant placement: A systematic review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 31(Suppl), s19-30. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.16suppl.g1
-
- Aghaloo, T. L., & Moy, P. K. (2007). Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 22(Suppl), 49-70.
-
- Berglundh, T., Armitage, G., Araujo, M. G., Avila-Ortiz, G., Blanco, J., Camargo, P. M., & Zitzmann, N. (2018). Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. Journal of Periodontology, 89(Suppl 1), S313-S318. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0739
-
- Bornstein, M. M., Chappuis, V., von Arx, T., & Buser, D. (2008). Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res, 19(10), 1034-1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01573.x
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous

