National Trends in Location of Death in Patients With End-Stage Liver Disease
- PMID: 33222367
- DOI: 10.1002/lt.25952
National Trends in Location of Death in Patients With End-Stage Liver Disease
Abstract
Despite improvement in the care of patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), mortality is rising. In the United States, patients are increasingly choosing to die at hospice and home, but data in patients with ESLD are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the trends in location of death in patients with ESLD. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging OnLine Data for Epidemiologic Research from 2003 to 2018. Death location was categorized as hospice, home, inpatient facility, nursing home, or other. Comparisons were made between sex, age, ethnicity, race, region, and other causes of death. Comparisons were also made between rates of change (calculated as annual percent change), proportion of deaths in 2018, and multivariable logistic regression. A total of 535,261 deaths were attributed to ESLD-most were male, non-Hispanic, and White. The proportion of deaths at hospice and home increased during the study period from 0.2% to 10.6% and 20.3% to 25.7%, respectively. Whites had the highest proportion of deaths in hospice and home. In multivariable analysis, elderly patients were more likely to die in hospice or home (odds ratio [OR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.35), whereas Black patients were less likely (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.73). Compared with other causes of death, ESLD had the second highest proportion of deaths in hospice but lagged behind non-hepatocellular carcinoma malignancy. Deaths in patients with ESLD are increasingly common at hospice and home overall, and although the rates have been increasing among Black patients, they are still less likely to die at hospice or home. Efforts to improve this disparity, promote end-of-life care planning, and enhance access to death at hospice and home are needed.
Copyright © 2020 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Comment in
-
Death at Home May Not Always Be the Best Option.Liver Transpl. 2021 Apr;27(4):604-605. doi: 10.1002/lt.25980. Epub 2021 Feb 17. Liver Transpl. 2021. PMID: 33426803 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Liver Transpl. 2021 Apr;27(4):606. doi: 10.1002/lt.25997. Epub 2021 Feb 18. Liver Transpl. 2021. PMID: 33503307 No abstract available.
References
-
- Tapper EB, Parikh ND. Mortality due to cirrhosis and liver cancer in the United States, 1999‐2016: observational study. BMJ 2018;362:k2817.
-
- Hart A, Schladt DP, Zeglin J, Pyke J, Kim WR, Lake JR, et al. Predicting outcomes on the liver transplant waiting list in the United States: accounting for large regional variation in organ availability and priority allocation points. Transplantation 2016;100:2153–2159.
-
- Marchesini G, Bianchi G, Amodio P, Salerno F, Merli M, Panella C, et al. Factors associated with poor health‐related quality of life of patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2001;120:170–178.
-
- Kim WR, Lake JR, Smith JM, Schladt DP, Skeans MA, Noreen SM, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2017 annual data report: liver. Am J Transplant 2019;19:184–283.
-
- Lai JC. Defining the threshold for too sick for transplant. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2016;21:127–132.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical